I saw your post.. and felt you needed reminding... The UK economy can trundle along on its own accord now.
Brexit, for once some facts.
- Thread starter flecc
- Start date
Speaking of Rudi:
On Saturday night, shortly after a federal judge in Pennsylvania dismissed the Trump campaign’s major lawsuit seeking to stop the certification, Rudolph W. Giuliani, President Trump’s personal lawyer, promised to appeal the loss to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and then, if necessary, to the United States Supreme Court.
But the papers the campaign filed with the Third Circuit were so narrowly tailored that they did not ask to reverse the ruling by the lower court judge, Matthew W. Brann, but merely requested permission to file another version of the allegations.
The appellate brief also did not request permission to go to the Supreme Court if it failed, but rather asked to have Judge Brann reconsider several issues he had already denied.
The appeals court said on Monday that Mr. Trump’s campaign could file new papers supporting its request by later this afternoon, and that the Democratic defendants could file new papers on Tuesday.
By that point, however, the certification of Pennsylvania’s vote will have already occurred, rendering the initial lawsuit moot.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/11/23/us/joe-biden-trump#the-gop-bungles-its-final-stand-to-stop-pennsylvanias-election-certification
GSA has now formally notified Biden that he can proceed with the transition.
Seems (some of) our MPs have forgotten they are not in charge of the judiciary.
Tory MPs rebuked over letter to judge in Charlie Elphicke references case
Private secretary to lord chief justice says it was ‘improper’ to seek to influence decision
The head of the judiciary has admonished six Tory parliamentarians for seeking to influence a judge overseeing a hearing this week on whether references written in support of the former MP Charlie Elphicke can be made public.
The six wrote last week to senior judges, copying in the judge who will oversee the hearing on Wednesday, expressing concern that “matters of principle” should first be considered by senior members of the judiciary and by parliament.
But in a response from the office of the lord chief justice for England and Wales, they were told it was “improper” to seek to influence the decision of a judge who would ultimately rule on the basis of evidence and argument in court.
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/nov/23/tory-mps-rebuked-over-letter-to-judge-in-charlie-elphicke-references-case
Tory MPs rebuked over letter to judge in Charlie Elphicke references case
Private secretary to lord chief justice says it was ‘improper’ to seek to influence decision
The head of the judiciary has admonished six Tory parliamentarians for seeking to influence a judge overseeing a hearing this week on whether references written in support of the former MP Charlie Elphicke can be made public.
The six wrote last week to senior judges, copying in the judge who will oversee the hearing on Wednesday, expressing concern that “matters of principle” should first be considered by senior members of the judiciary and by parliament.
But in a response from the office of the lord chief justice for England and Wales, they were told it was “improper” to seek to influence the decision of a judge who would ultimately rule on the basis of evidence and argument in court.
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/nov/23/tory-mps-rebuked-over-letter-to-judge-in-charlie-elphicke-references-case
Let us hope that the British Government is successful in protecting its citizens from the terrorist Shamima Begum. Hopefully she will remain in her chosen sand pit with all the other terrorist scum.
The point about being a citizen is ALWAYs being entitled to return. If she has done illegal actions or is a schizophrenic then she should be tried or treated. And yes we have one locally here in Dundalk, and she was brought home and court case pending.
Disappointing that it’s been ruled that Harry Dunn’s killer is entitled to diplomatic immunity. Hopefully a pathway for her to return to cooperate in an investigation will be found.
Last edited:
I just stumbled across this. What do you think? It might explain Sidney Powell's involvement after Trump said that she's nothing to do with him:
themarshallreport.wordpress.com
“Sidney Powell is registered as a MILITARY LAWYER and is the only one who can prosecute TREASON at a TRIBUNAL!”
So don’t let spin doctors and fake media tell you lies about the woman who is bringing down the giants in the swamp! And there are a great number of them, more than anyone could have imagined…
themarshallreport.wordpress.com
She can face justice and make her home in Syria, her chosen country. She is a dangerous security threat in the U.K. and we can’t afford the monitoring costs. She is also likely to need a new identity because someone will pop her. The cost of that is also unaffordable, we could spend the money on children’s swings, litter bins and other more useful items.
That is blatant hypocrisy. You are cedeing to the Home Secretary dictatorial power. Powers which would have existed under Habeus Corpus for 900 years in British Law. And 1200 years before that as a Roman Citizen
Think for a minute, you make the trip to Dublin next year to see England hammer the Irish Rugby team, and then you are declared Stateless when you appear at Holyhead. No judicial process , just a signature
She knowingly and very willingly left this country to join with and support against us a deadly sworn enemy of this country, peopled by beings whose behaviour isn't even human. In doing so she removed any entitlement to the benefits of civilisation, such as our legal system and other protections.
.
I am more than happy to take my chances.
However, I am supremely confident that it won't happen to me because I won't choose to cut an innocent person's head off with a knife, I won't throw gay people off tall buildings, I won't drill people's eyes out with a De-Walt cordless drill because they can't memorise passages of the Koran and I won't disembowel people whilst they are still alive. In addition, I won't leave the UK in order to support a group of people who carry out such actions.
The remainder of your reasoning goes way beyond the ridiculous and is utter nonsense.
Hopefully, common sense will prevail, Begum will remain in her chosen sand pit and we won't even think about her in 12 months time.
Ms Begum was stripped of her citizenship for public good reason. She isn't a UK citizen and has taken a decision to become our sworn enemy. The fact that it's all gone wrong, her sub-human cult has been defeated is just tough titty. I hope she likes sand for breakfast, lunch and dinner. I'm laughing at her self inflicted plight.
Let it be a warning to the rest of her scum.
Last edited:
I know Dave Pannick, played against him during school cricket matches in the early 1970s (we used to call him Corporal Jones "Don't Panic!"), he's a good lad. He'll do right by the UK
Flecc..those are lawless statements you are making. I though you better than that. It is not how we treat our friends or those on our side that defines civilised behaviour, but how we treat those whose ideals we abhor.
That passage is worn out, I’ve heard it so many times. Think up something original for yourself.
She’s a sworn enemy and she is a danger to the public. We don’t deserve to have her inflicted upon us.
Because it is repeated does not make it untrue. Your next sentence contains three assertions none of which are necessarily true. And if they are.
1. Try and then imprison her.
2. Intern her
3. I have my doubts!