Search results

Not the same thing at all.

Go to First Unread Trump was elected into office via the electoral system which operates in the USA. The same system which put Obama in the White House and could have put Hilary Clinton there. If the American people are dissatisfied with his performance, they will use the electoral system to...

My remarks regarding Khan carry a message, I believe that the man behaves like a clown, that he’s a fool and a chancer. That has been my point all along. The blimp carries no message, it’s just something for the weak minded to laugh at in a similar way that weak minded people used to laugh at...

The blimp goes beyond free speech. It carries no message and addresses no specific policy or decision. It is simply an effigy intended to insult, humiliate and cause hurt. The fact that it is endorsed by The Clown Prince of London aggravates the situation. If a group wishes to oppose Trump or...

News reports are suggesting that a bottle containing Novichok has been found in the house of the woman supposedly killed by the same substance. This is all very strange. As the old saying goes, there is nothing like a bottle of Novichok to deflect media attention away from Brexit.

I can’t agree with that. I see the blimp as an enterprise intended to insult and hurt an individual. The video clip derives the humour from the ridiculousness of the situation as a whole, not specifically the individual.

I hope they didn’t take too much money off you. From the news footage, the blimp actually looks a bit pathetic and underwhelming. Just like the Clown Prince of London who sanctioned it.

That’s enough for the offence under Section 5 of The Public Order Act to be complete. I’m very pleased that you recognise and accept my point.

The video clip is satirical humour and I like it. The Khan sanctioned balloon isn’t. It’s a low-grade childish novelty act, a bit like Khan himself.

Both situation are calculated and intended to cause hurt & humiliation. One via a racial theme, the other by being demeaning. It’s the intent which is unacceptable, not the means. In both cases, I profoundly disagree with the principle of a group of people planning, funding and executing a plan...

You know the answer to this question and so does everyone else reading this thread. If a giant gollywog had been inflated during Obama’s visit by those who opposed him and his threats to the British people, there would have been outrage & prosecutions, and rightly so. But somehow, in the minds...

I appear to have touched a nerve. I have a right to commentate on and give my opinion on aspects of the law and lawbreakers.

All very wordy, but if we boil all the crap out of the words, as Dr Jambanathan, my Thermo-Fluids lecturer used to say, we are left with what matters and sometimes that is nothing at all. The blimp is abusive, the blimp is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress. As a minimum, the police...

You actually spell it Chumba Wumba not Chuka Umunna. :-)

I think you are correct in much of what you say here and I think it’s probably the better outcome of the mess which Brexit has become. It’s the pathetic attempt to sell the latest Brexit plan and which further undermines parliament’s credibility which annoys me.

I’m very pleased that you agree.

Quoting Emily Thornberry. Oh dear. No need to say anymore.

Nothing within the above come as any surprise to me and it confirms my thoughts on the matter.

The blimp is a childish stunt orchestrated by a group of simpletons and sanctioned by Khan. Following a recent visit to London, I can see why he represents the people who currently occupy the city. The blimp is a visual representation which is abusive and will be in sight of someone likely to...

Trump does have an unenviable ability to make a fool of himself. I have mixed feelings about him. His ambition to make the welfare of The USA a high priority is sound. His methods, I question. What is unacceptable is for that filthy pig Khan to allow the insulting Donald Trump blimp to be flown...