Search results

That is very interesting... And is very consistent with the 2 jabs policy.

Difference in degree .. " must" includes compulsion and punishment. "Should "is instruction but without mandatory punishment. "Might" and may are wholly optional. Eg. I should take daily excercise. If I want to remain healthy I must take my daily anticoagulant or I die in a week, and I may eat...

Really fascinating stuff. Still makes our Newgrange a bit older .. but cutting into its claim.

"should" Implies Imperative.,not choice , not fashion , not spin . Me I like to go with the experts , and in this case I see the designer and then the qualifying authority as the experts

It probably escaped notice across the water ,but the date indicated by Grove in his letter was not accidental. It is intended as a lifeline to the DUP ,which otherwise will be hammered in elections which take place in 2022. Moreover he basically admits he has not actually seen the offending...

I think the inference was the reverse . We assume that all cases are caused by particles lodging initially in the nose, whereas they suggest a direct to lung infection in 25% of cases.

The only point I quibble here is "It's a matter of political judgement". It should be a matter of medical/ clinical research judgement and then political decision

Unless it is a reverse correlation. And Asthma protects from CV19 and the inhaler is the indicator.

I came across one of those odd medical you tube videos which in its own way might explain some of the anomalies. It was dated a number of months ago, when people were trying to get a grip. In full autopsies carried out on known fatal victims . All had heavy doses of CV19 in their lungs, but...

Did you hear what she said or are you going on hearsay ( The Daily Mail being a well regarded impartial source for EU matters .) I would like to think I reported what she said yesterday.? She apologised without any equivocation about the confusion regarding the NI Protocol. She did not in...

Careful your paranoia is showing. AZ make a very useful vaccine. Other health authorities around the world are delighted to have it. However some are more Prudent than in the UK and are stricting its use to those groups where the evidence is strong that it is effective and ensuring that it is...

..I was referring to the histogram not the time graphic

Actually they have given both the UK and its component countries. Also note that they only quote those Figures where the 2 doses have been administered in accordance with manufacturers guidelines.

Thank you. Basically what they are saying is Yep!. We agree with the EMA findings.

Reference please...

Contrast that if you can with the abject apology by UVDL this morning in the EU Parliament for an error in a draft document which was corrected within 3 hours. An error which has been alluded to , but never saw the light of day. And even more contrast that with the extremely unapologetic UVDL...

Is that what bitcoin is?.

Well I know for certain where the excess blood goes after an operation on the groin.!

Not for me to correct the venerable Flecc, but in the context of the current discussion highly relevant. The seminal time was the Battle of Britain and at that time Hurricanes outnumbered Spitfires 2.2 to 1. We don't know what the eventual end game with these viruses will be, but at present...

Really Zlatan, you are going around in circles here. The AZ vaccine has been proven to protect against the older and more prevalent CV19, particularly in younger people. Its performance in the older cohorts is still unproven. This is due to lack of evidence , not evidence of ineffectiveness...