Search results

not a bad suggestion .. one of your better ones. Germany is wealthy enough, intends to use 3 week window between jabs and has the necessary infrastructure for cold chain delivery of a modern economy

The EU and EMA have been extremely clear on this topic. The EMA did not issue a HALT notice. , The national authorities did, The EMA conducted a rapid and through investigation and identified flaws .. including it must be said in the UKs data collection.. otherwise it could not have been BELOW...

I indicated a few times last week that there might be under reporting in the UK . Supression of data is in my mind a much more serious academic and professional crime than plagarism. or even theft The EU alarm bells started ringing at 3 Million doses in the EU

Which half?. France, Germany had within hours removed the temporary hold, Ireland did so today.

Remember, without the EUs Vaccine exports to the UK, you would have only about 12M people with a single jab of AZ by this stage. The GREATEST DAMAGE to the Credibility of the AZ vaccine has been its limited supply. The AZ has not been a big player in Europe, . only about 10% of vaccinations...

This is a fuller section from the EMAs document... Of Yesterday, . In essence it gives the answer as to why the EMA acted as they did. Note that the initial concerns raised in Austria on 9 th March, where there was a death and a few CVT serous non fatalities, was assumed batch QC related...

Not being a finance guy, I am not sure of the significance of this , ... But I suspect it reduces economic activity in solicitors offices .. I did have a few shares with Eircom, back in the day, and they eventually went into Vodafone, and then CREST gave me a tiny lump sum. Since it was only...

Self praise?

Rather than a blanket condemnation, a point by point rebuttal might be more logical.. And yes of course the process was rushed and of course steps were bypassed, even the spokeswoman in the UKs Vaccination regulator referenced that in November..when she was arguing that the Important...

Susan, as a person living in an EU country, I feel I have a say. The UK got in first and did a few very risky things. 1. It authorised vaccines before they were validated by the normal process. In order to do so , they indemnified the maker ..Pfizer and then AZ from legal action. And of course...

Of course. There are no guarantees in this business..however experience with bacteria and antibiotics gives little comfort. And I can assure you with my experience of dealing with lung infections in my son over decades, it is something some of us are very aware of. The closest to a miracle...

Z... You continue to voice the same untruth. The data is different now. It has been checked,not supposed, not inferred, but checked. If you cannot see that as a quantitative difference, well there is little hope for you. The EMA had access to 6 M AZ cases and access to 47M Pfizer, They are in...

It was a view expressed in the BMJ. Unfortunately, you are choosing to discount facts when making your argument. I have described in sufficient detail the processes by which both the WHO and the EMA made their holding statements while they went around their work. ... What I did not...

There are those of us who can follow that math. However , you consistently ignore the real concern that injecting people with the Pfizer, and then leaving them, with a gradually waning level of protection, will encourage the development of yet more new variants or mutants. It is recognised that...

Come on now .. self praise etc.

Except the international community has lost trust with the UK establishment.. and yes you can read that sentence again. Extremely unfortunate, because there are millions of ethical, competent UK people, and some of them are world class scientists. The UK does not get to walk away from Herd...

..again we agree.. what she said was meaningless garbage and PR pulp.

On the contrary .. , "no extra data generated. ". That is very much untrue. . I already told you in an earlier posting today how they would react and the process. You don't change course or give a new heading without new information, but you do take the foot off the accelerator and start...

Except remember that UK AZ lady who said that the number of blood clots was LESS than random expectation . Didn't back it up with numbers.and she had 11 M potential data points.

I have searched back over a number of pages,..and I cannot find the offending statement.. but I think that the adjective" Perfectly " , as in" perfectly safe " was used. .. Perhaps you can correct me on that. Every engineering , scientific , medical intervention includes risk. The majority of...