Search results

Wasnt he a media invention to sell more papers and hence more propoganda???

Agreed.As long as it is the past, not sure it is just yet.

Yep and Germans bombed by mums chip shop. Come on Danidl, whats point of dragging past up. We, ve got enough issues to deal with without trying to apportion blame, guilt and recriminations for past grievances. We must learn from past but move on. Had we not could we really have started trade and...

And dont forget when authorities raped and killed our Queen...AD61 isnt that long ago, on seismic scale, and only a second or 2 in Ephamaris Astronomical... Bet some posters on here can remember it. Nearly all nations guilty somewhere and some time, but the relevant word is, in the "past".

Thats 4 more than Croatia have. Saying he has no influence in EU with 15 seats is an admission of the flawed nature of EU???

Probably yes.. But neither myself or media are the only critics of current fiasco.(by Corbyn)

I, m not negative of labour, just the fools in charge at moment. Labour has allowed itself to be hijacked... again... And my negativity towards them has nothing to do with anything I read in media. Its their liasons, its their policies, its their manifesto, its their actions, its their...

Internet has been least regulated mass media in history, from subjects mentioned to revenge porn, porn, grooming, bullying and fake news. Its way past high time something was done but what I have no idea. We all want free speech but all forget that should be tempered with added responsibility...

There are a couple that think the luxury of voting shouldnt be extended to women..

You keep threatening that but seem compelled to comment and judge.... and talk more BS... You said loads of times you wanted Corbyn to be next PM, to complete the ruination of Utilities.. And that he was playing long clever game... Must have got that from Abbott. To most that would suggest you...

Changing your stance somewhat now flecc. Cant say I blame you.

The antidote is catching yours, ie unreasoned support for the people destroying the labour party. Its isnt the slightest excuse, its exactly why labour aren't, and in current guise never will be, in power. Which they could have been by now. Thats the sad aspect of Corbyn.

You have taken my quote completely out of context. It was "Think of sutuation, Assange found guilty of rape and espionage with Abbot home secretary" It was explanation of a possible scenario in the future. A concept labour seem incapable of thinking about. It wasnt meant as a literal fact, but...

You hit dislike when I said they hadnt done labour any favours.(post 52198)

Yep, they dont give a damn about most things.

The other issue is many seem incapable of realising even though folk read certain papers they are not necessarily influenced by the rhetoric within. Quite the reverse in many cases. The Mail is so blatant its laughable at times, the Guardian much more subtle but biased all the same. BTW I also...

Speculation at best and still no reason for MPs wishing to get into power expressing support for a person facing charges of rape, which he would be doing had he been available to serve papers but he wasnt, a person facing charges of espionage and guilty of skipping bail. He might be innocent...

Please explain how Abbott or Corbyn expressing support for Assange, no matter what you think of him, is in any way beneficial to Labour party, their standing or credibility. It can only harm thier situation and will have no affect whatsoever on the case itself. At this stage they should keep out...

He may well be but my point was WTF is Corbyn (and Abbott) getting involved for. Just another episode of fools rushing in where angels fear to tread. He walks into it every time. Press will latch onto it and make him look even more stupid.

https://mol.im/a/6914049 Bet EU are looking forward to seeing Farage back in Brussels. If he gets elected that is.