Search results

yes, I think we have.

I hope there are many more like you! As you said, there is little difference between soft Labour and soft Tory. I still find soft Labour more electable.

I think we will have to put up with China expanding their defense spending. Their industrial capacity has already surpassed USA's. We should really stop spaffing money up the proverbial wall. What would our submarines do in the China Sea? Time for our Navy ruling the waves is well and truly...

amusing but I reckon, according to wikipedia, your argument suffers a type of fallacy called Modal fallacy – confusing necessity with sufficiency. I still have fond memory of lessons on Aristotle's logic in High School when I was 17.

our democracy is imperfect. That's the reason to believe future is better than now. If we remove all the faults from the system, that will be the end of us.

Blockchain as in Bitcoin blockchain has been hacked though.

The louder A. Rayner, A. McDonald, J. McDonnell and JC are at the conference, the more moderate Labour members need Kier. Anyone interested in a change of government can see that KS is the only realistic solution. I see in Reeves the voice of reason.

I believe Labour may have turned the corner from this conference. Kier does not make himself more electable but by giving Rachel Reeves the finance job, he's made Labour more attractive to industries. Reeves believes in QE but not nationalisation.

that was JC, RLB and John McDonnell's Labour party.

does anyone follow the German elections? that looks like Germany moves from centre right to centre left: SPD + Greens + ? The third partner could be the left party (DIE LiNKE). 25% + 15% + 5%.

it was Margaret Thatcher who pushed the EEC to enlarge.

Oppenheimer did contribute to the creation of the bomb with his Oppenheimer-Phillips Process, Deuterium is used to initiate the chain reaction.

that's not born out by reality. The USA has only attacked forces far inferior to its own.

says who? the USA?

John Simpson interviewed Pakistan's PM Imran Khan on News24, Afghanistan: the Pakistan view. @Zlatan: you should watch it. How the American politicians always prefer military solutions and end up making every situation worse. NATO is the typical American solution to contain Russia. It's on...

are you saying that without NATO, this country would have been invaded and can't defend itself? by who?

if you have the 328rpm Q70, you keep the speed (you can run the bike up to 37kph on a flat road when derestricted, 1.89M * 328 * 60/1000) but the climbing torque is poor. If you have the 201rpm motor, top assist speed is 22.7kph and climbing torque is much, much better, up to 40NM. A better...

you close your mind to the idea that many NATO members - UK, France, Germany, Spain, Italy etc can defend themselves without the USA. They have already enough sticks to wipe out humanity. They are bullied into joining and buying US armaments under the excuse of compatibility but they don't need...

NATO's purpose is the use of force for security. It does not keep peace. It wages wars, nevermind what you want to call them, war on terror, war in Afghanistan, Kosovo, etc. It threatens essentially those who are enemies of the USA. One thing it does not do is to keep peace. Europe would be...

the Q70 on the Brompton kit is a front motor optimised for the Brompton wheel whose circumference is 1.3M. your Dahon P8 Glide has 47-507 tyres, 1.89M circumference, it will be outside its optimal setting, you'll keep the speed but lose a fair bit (30%) of torque, maximum torque is 40NM *...