Search results

My eyes are not always as wonderful as they should be, and I thought that line was: Boris Johnson hides in fridge on live TV while dogging Which should have been ridiculous.

And no WTO protection for the UK (or anyone else): UK's post-Brexit trade at risk as WTO's top court shuts down Shutdown of court will leave UK at mercy of EU in its trading relationship after transition period...

Just found out that our GE ballot papers are magnolia. Carmarthen West and South Pembrokeshire get salmon colour. Good to know these important details.

Lies, Johnson, lies, Mail on Sunday, lies, Johnson, lies, Mail,... We’ve taken on the Mail on Sunday and won. But the newspaper regulator won’t correct the story till after the election https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/dec/10/break-embargo-expose-press-lies-labour

Brave Sir Robin.

Why of course - when Scotland, Wales and northern Ireland split (due to brexit/tories), they'll surely want their own royalty?

It appears the Tories are scared of making a mistake in the C4 debate. If they were to form the next government, would they even turn up?

Pretty clear stance in at least one paper: The Observer view on who to vote for in the general election Observer editorial After a tawdry campaign of lies and racism, the choice is clear – anyone but Johnson...

Islamophobia AND anti-Semitism. Good track record. General election 2019: Tories probe candidates over anti-Semitism claims https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50700874

Which is more important? Source or content? BJ is very obviously unable to deny it?

Even the USA can get a prisoner released from Iran. Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe remains there.

Ah! I see - we're already drawn, stuffed and trussed. (Or should that be Truss'ed?)

If he brings back non-metric "old" measures, let us remember that there are at least three different stones: wool (15lb), wool (24lb) and the one we most often think of for human weights (14lb). The system was absolutely rife with inconsistencies that came about for numerous reasons. And...

The difficulty should be seen to be that of having someone who cannot remain calm and controlled in charge. If, or perhaps, when a crisis develops, would you choose someone who can maintain rational thought or an idiot who keeps reverting to stock phrases and missing the point?

If you had to assess which of them has a huge brain on the basis of their coherence, it would have been a no contest. Corbyn spoke without breaking off to prepared phrases even in the middle of what should have been sentences.

And BJ denied knowing anything about the issue at all. Said he didn't know who was being referred to. So, either poor (awful) briefing, "they" decided not to inform him before the debate, or (as usual) lying.

Very odd. Can anyone leave aside their own party preference? Doubt I could do that.

"What I say three times is true" said the Bellman. "What I say three times three times three times in half an hour is still a lie" said the Bellend.

'Struth, does the idiot not understand how "over by Christmas" plays in the minds of those who have any memory of their history lessons?

Wonder if he is enjoying ITV's profile on now?