Search results

I agree with the first part, conservative membership chose him over JH knowing who BJ was. On the second part, I disagreed. Millions of voters believed that JC would have hit their purse hard, so the choice was straightforward between a Marxist socialist and low tax conservative in addition to...

I thought we were discussing whether internet access should be provided free of charge by our government as a principle. As I have already pointed out, it's free from lots of places, schools, libraries, public transports etc in addition to coffee shops, restaurants, banks etc. Students already...

access to the internet by commercial enterprises is not free. Someone (eg Alphabet) has to pay for the sub sea cables, microwave link ups, satellite links, telephone wires, underground optic fibre etc. If you want to put your server in a colo datacentre, most of your rent is spent on bandwidth...

My starting point is the need to pay respect to all, including those to pay taxes and those who run businesses. They should not be automatically assumed to be motivated by greed. I for one would like my tax money well spent so would vote for those who priotitise public services over re-distribution.

access to the internet is the top of a pyramid of other services and have ramifications in other areas, it's not as simple as a glass of free milk in the morning for schoolchildren. I know of a person who has a mobile phone and of course access to the internet but cannot 'sign on' or apply for...

consider this idea: because the internet is essential, it should be made freely available because someone may not be able to pay for it. Let's expand it to cover all daily essential things. who would then need money or earn money or pay taxes? then who would produce the goods and services in the...

there were a few TV documentaries exploring the economics of connecting remote rural properties to the internet. They need to link enough properties (in the hundreds) into a hub and connect that hub to the net. In the early days of the internet, I connected some customers to satellite broadbands...

in that case, JC should have made that his policy much earlier, not a couple of days before the election.

broadband is cheap. You can get 15GB download a month with unlimited calls for £8 a month with Vodafone. Honestly, cost is not exactly a debate here. offering free broadband to entice voters is not a mark of a great thinker.

lots of things are essential to life, but they are not free, eg food, water, electricity. Broadband is free in schools, libraries, airports trains etc, also available if you have mobile phone signal. Some people live in isolated areas where they don't have mobile phone signal, they will have to...

BJ for comparison? that's setting the bar pretty low. I am for lowish tax and smallish government, concentrating on education, healthcare, roads, energy. I am not particularly for public ownership unless it's related to healthcare or transport, OK for water but not free broadband. For me, JC is...

At the time, it was between Jeremy Hunt and BJ. BJ was the choice of the brexiteers so BJ edged it. I was still surprised at the scale of BJ's win in the ensuing GE. So many people believed that JC was unelectable.

I don't mind Hunt or Gove.

I was one of those small "c" voters after my naturalisation. I voted for John Major and did not regret it. In 97, Blair promised not to raise taxes and would keep to conservatives spending plan for at least a year. That was enough re-assurance for me. I think Starmer is wise not to make much...

I only quoted the wiki page. I did not make up those numbers. If you read the wiki page I linked to, you can see that their method (multilevel regression with poststratification MRP ) is standard method for estimating seats. As for the Daily Mail's speculation that JC could start a new party...

The polls reflect voting intentions. Labour currently leads, Tories comes second. Starmer is de facto PM in waiting. if there is an election now, BJ will lose the red wall that he won last time. You don't even need polls to tell you that. BJ's promise 'Levelling Up' has not materialised, that's...

maybe not a ringing endorsement but still enough momentum to remove the current conservative government. Just wait a few months for those small "c" conservative voters to be fed up with rising taxes, poor public services and 5%-7% inflation. The polling gap will widen then to 10% or more.

I believe that those on the Labour Left who would rather that BJ remains instead of Starmer will be in very small number. On the other hand, small "c" conservative voters who are sick of seeing BJ and the likes of Owen Paterson or Pritti Patel on TV will be in much larger number.

Starmer did not come from a rich family. His dad was a toolmaker, not investment banker. The thing is, both Starmer and LibDem's Ed Davey are similar in that they are the opposite of flamboyant. May be the country would do better with non-flamboyant leaders.

No, you want BJ - you have made it plenty clear. On the contrary. Labour is more unified now than under the last management.