Search results

I agree with that. so far, no widespread irregularities were found. So why don't you accept that Biden has apparently won until some Court gives Trump a reason to dispute the result?

if it is just the way it rolls so why can't you accept that Biden is the probable winner?

why is it that you don't mention Biden has 76.45 million votes , Trump 71.43 million votes. Where is the fairness in it if Trump had won again? That's before mentioning that Trump glorifies alternative truths, hate, division, white supremacists and misuse of government powers.

vfr puts the stories out. He never says that he believes in them. a technical difference, but it does force us to choose what to believe.

here is the source of funds for Biden's campaign: Large Contributions $580,956,297 61.19% Small Individual Contributions (< $200) $368,342,252 38.80% Other $72,438 0.00% Candidate self-financing $0 0.00% Federal Funds $0 0.00% and for Trump's: Large Contributions $325,998,209...

all political donations are tax deductible so yes.

you are right that Biden will win in about 10 days because we don't have a Trump in charge of the count. It's disgraceful of Trump to accuse tens of thousands of election officials, both Reps and Dems, of cheating without evidence. He is the only one president ever accusing his own government...

some made a nuisance and got thrown out. they can of course complain but I don't see that changes the result. Only recounts can change the result and I can't see how Trump is going to win any recount. Trump may just throw in the towel by Wednesday.

I just went a little further. I don't believe you'd let poor children go hungry nor force them to eat whatever they get given. BJ will announce a £750 million program to benefit children of poor family. That's shows how well Marcus Rushford has succeeded.

I did read your posts - the point I'd like to make to you is this, if you are in charge, you will see that there is a lot more that need doing and you'd want to volunteer. I used to go to fit computers in Pupil Referral Units and Special Needs schools. I could see clearly that the children are...

that money is on top of holiday and food. if it were up to you, should children of poor families go hungry during holiday or without pocket money? I was born into a poor family, I do know what it's like when the money is tight and before you say beer and fags, they didn't drink nor smoke.

it's only £4.35 a week.

apparently, the program involves a a small amount of cash for poorest families but most of the spending is on activities with meals for poor kids.

you can just as well suggest other possibilities of fraud. They are just that, possibilities. Realistic? No. Don't forget Trump's litigation has so far yielded zero result.

I am sure plenty of people would have spotted double votings if this is the case. if there is a way to change the result, Trump's lawyers would find it.

you can't believe stuff like that. It's more likely that the governing party will pass laws to restrict or prevent groups of opposition voters to participate or change the voting system like from first pass the post to PR or vice versa.

The postmark is generally not a problem, ballots are delivered by USPS so they are pretty much foolproof. the machine will flag any security envelope that the person has voted in person, so his mail-in vote is discarded. Whether he/she is going to be prosecuted is a different matter. the thief...

each vote is placed inside a security envelope. That security envelope must have the voter's signature. The envelope has also computer readable markings to identify the voter and enables signature comparison. If that person also votes in person, their voting record is flagged at check in. So...

Trump's early lead in the 9 swing states was due to the sequence of vote counting. Results from in person votes are immediately known, counting of early votes is done next and postal votes, military votes and overseas votes last. Trump tells his supporters to vote on the day, Biden tells his to...

the last I heard about it was Aaron Banks dropped the llbel case against Carole-Cadwalladr earlier this year. I wonder if you want to comment on the article below. https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/arron-banks-drops-part-of-libel-case-against-observers-carole-cadwalladr/ and here is the update on...