Search results

So are you saying they did get the gold off the bus in the Italian Job.( I did always wonder)

Michael Caine: 'I voted Brexit. It was about freedom, not immigrants' “I voted for Brexit. What it is with me, I’d rather be a poor master than a rich servant,”

Sing Along ……..

What about the bit about Boris getting a deal and then running it out of time in the HOC ? and the bit about EU law over ruling UK law when it comes to article 50.

An interesting article on how Boris might be able to leave with no deal. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/how-could-britain-leave-the-eu-without-a-deal-on-october-31/ar-AAIisKU?ocid=spartanntp

Surely in all of Croatia they could find an MEP with only one leg :p :p :p

Good word "proportionally" Maybe it would be better to go on country size by how many people per acre rather than population.

Because we haven't ******* left yet.

Sounds lovely....So the EU propose a change in immigration where illegal immigrants no longer have to apply for asylum in the first safe country they come to but can choose where to apply. What percentage would want to come to the UK??? How many countries would vote with us??

I think You answered the wrong person again.....NURSE

No we don't.....We get to vote in 87 MEP's out of 626...In a Parliament that has majority voting, (if we lost the Veto)That's not going to get us anywhere.

Yes......Should be easy :D :D :D

Don't forget, The article was written by somebody trying to defend the Lisbon Treaty. But......and It's a pretty big but. If the Lib-Dems had voted against the increase it wouldn't have been passed. They sold out for a referendum on PR. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11964669

Because we get to vote them out...Look what happened to the Lib-vote when they went back on the promise of tuition fees.

The Logic is... why propose a law that would massively disadvantage the UK when we had a Veto. I would be very worried if the EU could pass laws that massively disadvantaged us by a majority vote. For example a new immigration law.

You edited it after my reply you Cockwomble, so how could I have read it before my reply (my time machine is broken) go back and read my Edit below. Edit.. You added a few paragraphs after my reply (as you usually do) past voting is no clue to future voting..( if they knew we would veto it then...

If you can't see the disadvantage of this to the UK then your blinkers need adjusting. Edit.. You added a few paragraphs after my reply (as you usually do) past voting is no clue to future voting..( if they knew we would veto it then why propose it)

Most of it is BS. But if you read the link OG has provided some of it is quite worrying. We don't lose our veto but a lot more laws are to be decided by majority vote with no veto. We also wouldn't lose our rebate automatically (this would be decided by a vote) if this vote was a majority vote(I...

The proposal will be watered down, maybe taking away the charity status.