Search results

I think it does mean nuclear war: The combined population of the NATO Countries: 944 million, over 12 % of the world's population. The population of Russia: 144 million, 1.8% of the world's population. Overwhelmed by these immense odds against him, who knows what a trapped brutal thug like...

It's because I really care about their lives and don't want to see them killed or horribly maimed. It is always stupid to take on an opponent who you know will win, this is the one area where the human animal is very inferior in intelligence to almost all of the other animals. They normally do...

What has that reply to do with my post? In that post I pointed out that NATO shooting down Russian planes meant a nuclear WW3 would follow. Only a lunatic would advocate that. Even the nut cases in the Kremlin and the Pentagon won't go beyond putting them on alert. .

The same in one respect, I would see it as totally wrong. But since it's a hypothetical question I can't answer further. The Ukraine invasion though isn't hypothetical so I've been able to comment much further, such as explaining why Putin has acted as he's done. In your mind you seem to...

My posts are entirely knowledge from the time. You should know this since you were an adult in your late 20s and early 30s at the time of the events I commented on. So either you are being disingenuous or your memory of current affairs from the late 1980s to the early 2000s is sadly lacking...

Again, that means WW3 with nuclear weapons used. .

We cannot use planes or drones to shoot down Russian planes or helicopters since it would constitute NATO declaring war on Russia, WW3. That is why for the same reason we cannot institute a "no fly" zone since enforcing it would mean shooting down Russian aircraft. .

Once again Zlatan stop making up what I posted because you are so utterly clueless about the background to all this. My criticism of the USA was about the way they rejected the entirely reasonable Mikhail Ivanovich Gorbachov as president by using covert CIA action to get rid of him, in favour...

Yes they do now, but as posted, I was speaking of the Orange revolution forcible takeoever in 2004 nearly 20 years ago. Then that had the support of only a quarter of the country. There was roughly another quarter against (Russian) and half who didn't seem to know quite what was going on...

I don't think oblivion a risk but I do hate that he's been pushed increasingly into the Chinese side. The world is splitting into two again and it's hardly sensible to help the other side of the future. .

I agree partition is usually no solution, but it can work for a few decades. Donbass though is a very sensitive subject for the Russians, both inside and outside Ukraine. Ukraine had been stable and enjoying a privileged position with Russia until the USA started their campaign of...

Indeed that is surprising. However there may be an element of currying favour since the Swiss have some serious problems with their EU relationship and want more favourable treatment. .

Quite the opposite as you show with your link. That is the result, not the cause, of the history you do not know. The history is not an excuse but it is the reason for the events, showing how the events need never have happened. You lack of knowledge leads you into mistakes, such as being...

Danidl, Woosh and I fully understand this subject so we post impartially. You very clearly have little understanding of it so post emotionally on what you see at the moment. We don't need you to tell us that what is going on is appalling, any fool can see that. But it takes knowledge to...

Broadly agreed, but why argue about Donbass? An old Russian population region with long outdated and broken down industrial infrastructure. Even the Russians didn't want it until they realised it might become useful in protecting their southern fleet. I doubt they'd want it so much if Crimea...

I do not lie in this forum and all those are facts verifiable from Western sources. You do not even begin to know this subject yet feel you can insult me by inferring I'm posting lies. Hadn't you noticed that Woosh, almost the only other impartial member posted a Like to the post you are...

As I posted, future. In a long major address to the National Peoples Congress Presient Xi Jinping of China spelled out China's future aims. In essence that they would convert the whole world into Chinese style single party democratic communism. That did not mean by warfare but by the same...

He already has that, as I showed in a photo at the foot of this post .

What they are creating though is not a tightly defined corridor. It's a substantial land area as part of Russia with the Crimea the end of that. .

No, all that is irrelevant to the subject of Putin securing his southern fleet. Why is it that you can never keep to a subject? And no, I am not being silly. I just happen to be almost the only person in this thread commenting impartially. That prompts many of you to think I am supporting...