Search results

No Danidl, I've read your posts, please read mine. Begum left our State to join the fledgling State of Isis which had been established by warfare in formerly Iraqi territory. Becoming the Jihadi bride of a citizen of that State and conceiving a child who was a citizen of that State she then...

I haven't, you have. As far as I'm concerned all of them are permanently persona non grata. Hers has been thanks to the "bleeding hearts" like yourself and Danid pleading for her from the outset. Entirely your doing. The answer to which is keep them out and match their denial of any...

I agree, but I was speaking of their politicians. .

What a weird reading of what I posted! The exception was clearly in her having an alternative citizenship route which the other 1500 you mentioned didn't have. .

I wish we'd taken that line decades ago in every matter, but sadly we've always been obsessed with the mythical Special Relationship. I bet there's been many a political snigger about that in the US of A, along the lines of "special my arse". .

But Begum is an exception. It was said at the time that Bangladesh almost certainly would accept her according to their precedent and as a strongly Islamic country that made sense since she would not be any threat to them. But she's made it clear that she didn't want to take that option, then...

Not entirely so, we removed the nationality of circa 10% of them. We know of the 108 who lost it in 2016/2017, but since then the Home Office have become coy on this subject so the total could be far higher with the last three years added to those two. .

Schwalbe Marathon Plus 26" for road use are in the standard form as on THIS LINK. They don't appear to make the more rugged tread Tour version in 26". .

A simple argument but a very weak one, her lawyer can talk with her anywhere, the world is not just that camp. I repeat, she does not need to appear in court and doesn't necessarily have a right to in current law. Every day people are being convicted, sentenced and even locked up without...

Possibly not, since the Supreme Court has shown a tendency to idealism, but see my answer below. I believe the Court of Appeal ruling is wrong since the only thing in question for the case in their ruling is the academic point of her entitlement to Bangladeshi citizenship. She cannot...

Welcome to the forum Shaun. :) .

Wrong. Failing to take extreme action to protect its citizens when necessary is extremely foolish and short sighted. Haven't we seen enough cases where we've kidded ourselves that we've successfully trained someone out of extremism, only for them to turn on us and kill? In recent Jihadi...

It can be done and was done, fait accompli. That it was against law is academic, it happened and was enforced. It is far from unusual for illegal orders to be made and enforced, our government has done it a number of times in connection with the Human Rights Act, some far more deserving than...

No it isn't, the option existed. Two facts: Begum had already said she didn't want to pursue the Bangladeshi option, saying she wanted to return to Britain with her child for the child's sake. While at the same location she confirmed that she still retained her Jihadi beliefs. The Home...

She has the option to apply for Bangladeshi citizenship but has declined to exercise it. That is why her High Court application rightly failed. .

The one protection in law is that by international agreement a citizen cannot have their sole citizenship removed, making them stateless. Having a right to Bangladeshi citizenship by a family relationship meant Begum had no protection from losing the British one. She was just one of many, we...

She was born here but left at 15 years old to become a Jihadi bride. Becoming pregant she then wanted to return at 19 years old for the baby's sake while not renouncing her Jihadi beliefs. The Home Secretary removed her British citizenship which he could do since she also had another...

No they are not, all were entirely lawful. Our Home Secretary concurred when he removed her citizenship. Only applicable when communication is possible. ISIS are far beyond any possibility of civilised human communication, not only with us but with the humans from the past, as witness their...

Irrelevant nonsense, we aren't discussing games. .

She knowingly and very willingly left this country to join with and support against us a deadly sworn enemy of this country, peopled by beings whose behaviour isn't even human. In doing so she removed any entitlement to the benefits of civilisation, such as our legal system and other protections. .