Search results

yes.

the new law is applicable to manufacturers. As a user, you can keep the twist and go throttle or have one fitted. The manufacturer cannot do that to a new bike but anyone else can have a throttle fitted to a used bike. This weird situation comes about because the new law does not apply to kits.

some 48V kits have the same footprint as their 36V cousins. http://wooshbikes.co.uk/?hubkits#swx02-48v-kit They weigh the same too.

No. Politicians usually speak with a forked tongue.

kits are made easier to install over the years. They are now largely plug and play. If you are a competent DIYer and capable of looking after the bike yourself, then converting your bike is not only satisfying but also financially rewarding. If you compare the electrics of a bike costing...

sorry, I disagree. Nobody stops you or anyone else to ride at over 25kph, the law only stops electric assistance above 25kph. if you want to go faster, pedal a little more. That's even playing field for all cyclists who share the same facilities.

that's a very useful way to rattle the hard brexiters. I watch most Question Time programs. That point has never got to the brexiters among the audience. They know, it's just that they prefer to block it out.

it does not have to work, as long as it is not unthinkable, it will allow the can to be kicked down the road, then it's done enough.

even Corbyn did not dare to call it customs union without the 'a', and he is not held prisoner like she is.

you sound just as critical of her as the brexiters posting on the Express. She has today chosen a soft brexit course and won't endear herself to the evangelist brexiters for sure.

Southend this afternoon: half of the snow has gone, winds have also died down a little bit, not so cold (just about freezing) but it was still snowing a bit when I went out for a ride.

beautiful shape, nice components but I reckon you'll need a chainguard.

it did go up in the morning JC made his speech, peaking at $1.406 - then dropped back in the afternoon, presumably after the journalists analysed his speech and decided that it was the same cherry cake - not the same cake mix but still cherry cake.

she has softened the brexiters with the role of the ECJ. a) accept that we can't have cake and eating it (access to SM won't be as good) b) accept the ECJ jurisdiction in all the areas that we continue to participate in (Euratom, Erasmus, Pharmaceuticals, Aviation) c) accept binding agreement...

as long as she can kick the can far enough to get the transition deal done, the rest can wait. Inertia will do the work for a soft brexit.

I am watching TM delivering her speech. It's her best so far. Much more details than I expected. Pretty good so far.

they have the backing of a vast majority of local conservative associations.

Latest polls confirm more voters are switching to remain. It was neck and neck up to May 2017, the margin is now 4% (52/48 from 48/52) and seems to be accelerating. https://whatukthinks.org/eu/questions/if-there-was-a-referendum-on-britains-membership-of-the-eu-how-would-you-vote-2/?removed...

credit to her, anyone else in her position - held prisoner by JRM's European Research Group, wouldn't do much better. She managed so far to keep to the time table. Next big step is to agree on the transition period. The hard brexiters know that if we manage to agree on the transition, their...

her 5 tests are a repetition of what she said before: "implementing the decision of the British people; reaching an enduring solution; protecting our security and prosperity; delivering an outcome that is consistent with the kind of country we want to be; and bringing our country together...