The new reduction of animal rights legislation will put a stop to that pretty sharpish!I'm astonished OG! Trolls have passports!! Whatever next?
Tom
The new reduction of animal rights legislation will put a stop to that pretty sharpish!I'm astonished OG! Trolls have passports!! Whatever next?
Tom
Trust is a very precious commodity. All Western European establishments carrying out experiments on animals have protocols in place and have ethics committees.I take a different view from you on that matter 'Danidl'. I'm afraid I can't determine how one is possible without the other and I don't trust the research scientists to make the distinction.
Tom
Your last paragraph could just as easily have started with Humans treat Humans as well as other animals deplorably...Sorry but the notion that animals do not have emotions nor feel pain is so obviously stupid it beggars belief, you own eyes will provide all the evidence you need to prove that
We know where our food comes from, we also know very well it is thinly disguised cruelty that we should by now have consigned to the dustbin of history.
Our nature is omnivorous, that can't be helped, but needless cruelty and denigrating animals to excuse their use in Science is morally unsupportable, however convenient it may appear.
It is not uniformed comment to tell the truth,
Humans treat animals deplorably, always have and no doubt unless stopped always will, but the very least we can do is accept they have a right to life, recognise and accept their true nature, and accept our responsibilities to them, as all organic life on the planet is related.
Uninformed seems to be a popular response to which my response is to reply it is uninformed to believe the only way to save human lives is to make other animals suffer, and to suppose science cannot come up with a better wayYour last paragraph could just as easily have started with Humans treat Humans as well as other animals deplorably...
It is uniformed when one attributes the full range of human attributes to other animals. It is uninformed when this affection is selectively centred on particularly nice furry animals and ignores the scaley, the hard shelled, the invertebrates...
When one knows that one's immediate family have been saved by that self same research, and one knows the value of vaccination, of transplants and informed research, it is difficult to entertain vacuous nonsense.
There was more outcry for the few horses killed at that London barracks outrage some years ago than for the soldiers.
Interesting developments here. At no time or stage did I state or imply that animals did not feel pain. At no stage did I recommend cruelty. My posting was in response to one by Zathlan where he was implying that medical research was not being done in his name.Uninformed seems to be a popular response to which my response is to reply it is uninformed to believe the only way to save human lives is to make other animals suffer, and to suppose science cannot come up with a better way
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
I would see James Connolly as the true hero of the Irish rising. Many of the other leaders were starry eyed. Idealists with notions of blood sacrifice redeeming the manhood of Ireland ... And other such guff.I came across this and while any connection with the topic of this thread may not be immediately obvious, it occurs to me that 120 years after Connolly wrote these words, Ireland may shortly suffer greatly yet again as a result of the Westminster government's influence.
View attachment 22209
Tom
Virtually all of what Mr Dodds is saying I agree with particularly the passage where he says it's "economic madness to cut yourself off from your major market"...The BBC has put out an interview withthe Orange Order's parliamentary spokeswomanthe leader of the DUP.
Having listened to her criticise the Irish Taoiseach over the border arrangements, it strikes me that she is singularly ignoring the fact that a hard border between NI and Eire will be inevitable should the UK fail to satisfy the EU on the issue.
Her friends at Westminster have tried to pretend to the EU that an invisible border will work perfectly well and while that may suit many in NI, it is outside the scope of the arrangements in place across the EU which is essentially tax and tariff free. It goes without saying that NI will not be within the EU upon 'Brexit' taking place.
Instead of criticising the Taoiseach, Foster should be directing her bile towards Mrs May and the tory government which created this appalling mess.
A billion smackers goes a long way!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42064743
Tom
Look on the Bright side there might, just might I say conceivably be someone in the ranks of Tory HQ that could do a better job as negotiatior, and I know the very person too!Some may see this matter as trivial but I find it appalling and Davis along with May's chief of staff should be held responsible for breaching the rules on expenses:
david-davis-threatened-to-skip-brexit-talks-unless-he-was-flown-in-by-the-raf
Tom
Notwithstanding the current cross-border markets and the implied co-operation, I'm at a loss to see how the EU's principles can be upheld without a hard customs border across Ireland. It seems to me that the EU as we know it would be totally undermined without a border that ensures the UK is wholly without access rights to the benefits enjoyed at present.What he is omitting to say is that we have an all Ireland energy market and an all Ireland agricultural market with an integrated supply chain
My point, such as it is, was to imply that there is currently so much cooperation at present, in a European context, between booth sides of the island, and with the two economies so linked, that the forced separation will be very costly, divisive and put all manner of strains on relationships.Notwithstanding the current cross-border markets and the implied co-operation, I'm at a loss to see how the EU's principles can be upheld without a hard customs border across Ireland. It seems to me that the EU as we know it would be totally undermined without a border that ensures the UK is wholly without access rights to the benefits enjoyed at present.
There is a circle that can't be squared, I fear.
Tom
I read that article yesterday.An extract from Bike Europe on anti-dumping duty on e-bikes from China...
Accordingly, the Complaint has constructed a normal value by adding 14% direct overheads, 4% labour, 1% SG&A and 10% profit (the lower range of the target profit established in this Complaint) to the detailed materials costs. The total EXW costs were compared with the quoted export prices and show significant double digit dumping.”
Annex 22 also says “The Annex contains evidence of e-bikes prices offered by Chinese exporting producers to EU customers in the form of sample quotations. The information is business confidential by its nature. The excel table of the same Annex contains the price information on an anonymised basis. The disclosure of the actual quotes would be of significant disadvantage to the parties providing the information.”
On the basis of that price information by Chinese e-bike exporters EBMA calculated that the lowest dumping margin comes at 193% while the highest dumping margin stands at 430%!
What this will mean for the to be imposed anti-dumping duty when the European Commission’s investigation reaches the conclusion that dumping is taking place, is hard to tell. But what happened last Friday in the European Parliament will play a big role on that.
Make of that lot what you will....
KudosDave
I did it was option 2.Dan, you didn`t mention 6.
ROI also leaving the EU?
As a `partner` along with the UK i`m sure these whole islands would do quite well in trading with the rest of the world?.