Cheaper than having our own, and anyone who thinks that we have any control over the USA at present is very sadly mistaken. The USA can't bully Europe as a whole which is why we are best off in, having the control of combined strength.
Sorry no sale John, seems like my cunning plan has a major flaw - I can't get 18 members (or even 1) to commit to itHi Shemozzle,
Cunning plan, I'm waiting for your order
[SUB][SUP]
[/SUP][/SUB]
I am not convinced that America would commit their nucleur weapons in defence of Europe, if it was attacked with WMD, I think they reserve them only for attacks on the USA, despite what they may say now, as they would look for a OUT, if such a nightmare scenario became reality.
But why do so many countries, the majority, not get involved in this way? They are the proof that I am being serious in saying it's a realistic option.
Indeed, even to the extent of making it illegal for any of their citizens to participate in WW2.
Indeed, so why not ignore them. If you just cannot do that, instead of just criticising them in a way that upsets those elsewhere in the world, why not campaign against the policy of having of religious schools in this country. Action against a wrong, like charity, should begin at home.
Freedom of speech is far more valuable than the the sensibilities of alien man made religions that does not relate to its enviroment or respect common human values.
I guess thats the thing about this shrinking planet we live on - soon there will be nowhere we can not call 'home'. All in good time. All in good time.
And we have that here. Take our nearest neighbour France as an example. They are by law a secular nation not allowing any religion to play any part in government or education, and they enforce that rigidly, banning veils and other religious symbolism in schools. Have they suffered anything like 9/11 or 7/7? No, simply because their action is domestic and thus respected by the others who otherwise don't agree with such policies.
Valiant try Lynda, but the odds are overwhelming.SO....anyway...... am I alone in thinking that a sub £1500 bike with decent spec is reasonably priced ?
Im talking about the general public here who arent interested or capable of fitting kits.
It may surprise many of you when I admit to being one of them
There are also several sub £1000 bikes that are excellent value for money.
So, really I dont think that there is a big e-bike scam unless its from sellers trying to con the public into buying sub standard examples.
I can remember a time not long ago when, for me, the cut off point would have been £1000 but I do feel that some suppliers in this country have made a supreme effort in upgrading the specs of their bikes recently.....and as we all know, there is no such thing as a free lunch
Backontrack Lynda
Well...you know me John....I can be very tryingValiant try Lynda, but the odds are overwhelming.
Does anyone else find this thread ludicrous and totally disconnected from electric bikes or am I missing something here
Since we appear to have an active moderator, I was hoping the no-relevant other subject posts would have been shifted to the Charging Post.
Still, the original subject was a very contentious one anyway, so dispute does have a place here.
