When I first rode the bike a couple of weeks ago, I went to a few of my local hills, some which had given me trouble on my unpowered bike in the past, and others which I had NEVER ridden up without stopping and walking instead.
And I was amazed that I could get up all of them - not sailing up, but with some human effort plus the motor, I got up them.
So, today, still not having charged the battery (down to 2 lights now), I went out and did the hills again. Or tried to. I JUST about made it up the worst ones, but the old familiar heart-thumping symptoms were back, and my legs felt weak.
So is this just the way Wisper batteries and motors perform? I had thought (wishfully, maybe) that the battery was like a petrol tank, and just went from full to nearly empty without any change to the performance of the engine. But it seems that there is a large drop in torque as it gets lower.
Which, if true, puts a different interpretation on the 'range' - I knew I wouldn't get anything LIKE the maximum, being around 120kg, but I thought that for the limited range that I WOULD get (say 15 miles), I wouldn't lose out on battery POWER.
Two other possible factors: one, it's very hot and sultry in London today, but I don't really think that's making this level of difference. Two, unlike the first test ride, this time I'm using the gears, to give my legs a break (viz. on the first ride I was in 7th all the time, and this time I dropped down to 3 or 4 as I went up the hill). Still pushing my legs round as hard, if not harder, and certainly pushing them round FASTER than before. Does this make any difference?
Why no charge yet? Well, Steve at Wisper recommended that I run it down as far as I dared (at least to 2 lights, if not 1) and then give it a 'conditioning' charge. Which I shall be doing overnight, so them thar hills again tomorrow.
Allen. (Wisper 905 se)