I thought that the article in AtoB Magazine regarding batteries was quite interesting.
First, it seems as though the older battery technologies such as NiMH are still performing well in comparison to Lithium-ion. This decade+ old NiMH technology delivers a more durable and longer lasting battery. The slightly lower energy density being compensated for by a depreciation cost 5 times lower than that of Lithium-ion batteries.
Second, the "quality" batteries actually work out to be the most expensive to use. Kalkhoff and Ezee being the worst. The old buy cheap, buy twice saying may actually make economic sense in this instance. I suppose the philosophy being that two or three cheap batteries will outlast one, "quality" expensive battery.
First, it seems as though the older battery technologies such as NiMH are still performing well in comparison to Lithium-ion. This decade+ old NiMH technology delivers a more durable and longer lasting battery. The slightly lower energy density being compensated for by a depreciation cost 5 times lower than that of Lithium-ion batteries.
Second, the "quality" batteries actually work out to be the most expensive to use. Kalkhoff and Ezee being the worst. The old buy cheap, buy twice saying may actually make economic sense in this instance. I suppose the philosophy being that two or three cheap batteries will outlast one, "quality" expensive battery.