Perhaps some imbeciles put ideas like that across so convincingly the citizens of Hartlepool mistook them for promises?
Brexit, for once some facts.
- Thread starter flecc
- Start date
I agree, and that is a fault with the benefits system. I realise the benefits system isn't the fault of the EU, but as part of withdrawing from Europe, the Government needs to overhaul the benefits system as well.
There are too many able bodied young people loafing around on benefits or attending a building which is now called a university, paying £9000 a year to get a "degree" in a subject that is absolutely no use whatsoever.
These people could be doing the essential jobs and be happily employed with a sense of purpose. Not all of mummy's little snowflakes can turn out to be academics. We just need to cream off the top 10% and invest in them for the future.
I think France will be following us out the door and they will be holding it open for Holland.
Its over.
"Theresa May has declared without hesitation that she would order a nuclear strike to kill hundreds of thousands of people if she thought it was necessary."
We can all sleep safer in our beds now we know the country is run by a totally inhuman loony.
As with all such logic, perhaps it has escaped her attention that the result would not simply be the deaths of the people she has targeted, but the end of the history of not merely our nation but all others too?
70 million of our own people dead at the order of this woman? and she gives a glib yes as an answer? if she thought it was necessary.
And in who's name is she acting? not mine!
Totally unfit to run a Whelk stall.
The Goodness is truly flowing isn't it?
We can all sleep safer in our beds now we know the country is run by a totally inhuman loony.
As with all such logic, perhaps it has escaped her attention that the result would not simply be the deaths of the people she has targeted, but the end of the history of not merely our nation but all others too?
70 million of our own people dead at the order of this woman? and she gives a glib yes as an answer? if she thought it was necessary.
And in who's name is she acting? not mine!
Totally unfit to run a Whelk stall.
The Goodness is truly flowing isn't it?
So education is really a waste of money for the plebs, eh Tillson?
Great idea that, lets keep it for the wealthy and the party faithful, and the offspring of the old boys network.
How are you going to find the top 10% ?
the mess we are currently in spooked them a little bit. They will wait until Mrs May makes brexit a success before the NF make their move.
I'm delighted to hear her make this statement. This restores the stalemate with any would be aggressor knowing that an attack by them will result in their total annihilation.
Would Germany have invaded Poland if the Polish had been equipped with a nuclear arsenal? No they would not and millions of lives would have been saved.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/girl-fighting-life-after-mum-8448196
Perhaps I was too precipitate in using the word 'Censor'
Perhaps I was too precipitate in using the word 'Censor'
Talented kids always surface. It's a case of reforming the state school system and restoring respect and discipline. An environment will then follow in which kids will achieve their full potential, whatever that may be.
I think everyone should stop moaning about things they can do **** all about and get on your bikes and ride 
Education , especially post 16, became getting bums on seats to attract funding. Who,s bum and which seats didn't really matter. I had cases of " lecturing/ teaching" ( both relative exagertatiobs) Post A level standard material to kids who perhaps couldn't have passed 11 plus years ago..but then on other hand there is loads of young talent in UK..Its about fitting places to kids, or should be, and not vice versa. But I,ve been out 15 years or so...
I should have told you that brexit changes the economic sentiment, the world thinks it's too risky where we are heading, no good will come out of it for a few years at least so they sell sterling and take their money out. So yes, brexit causes weakening of sterling. BP is quite weak at the moment, good target.
We are all agreed that the referendum was only advisory. 17 million advised that they wanted to leave,16 million advised that they wanted to stay.
If the leavers are so urgent to get us out why not put the vote of whether we stay or leave to parliament. After all parliament is sovereign,parliament has been democratically elected by the people.
Let parliament have a free vote on the decision.
Simple solution.
KudosDave
If the leavers are so urgent to get us out why not put the vote of whether we stay or leave to parliament. After all parliament is sovereign,parliament has been democratically elected by the people.
Let parliament have a free vote on the decision.
Simple solution.
KudosDave
Great post OG, probably your best at demonstrating your limitless knowledge and appreciation of world politics...
How many holes can you get in your feet ?
Can you imagine what rest of world,both our enemies and friends; service personnel tasked with manning trident, builders of both it and its supply system, if May had replied to question
" oh no, I,d never give order to launch" ..there goes our nuclear deterent in one sentence. I,d call you names, but don't need to..
Its one of reasons Corbyn is unelectable, but time will tell.
At 1 of Article 50,Treaty of Lisbon....
' any member state may decide to withdraw from the union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.
Leavers are placing a lot of faith in Theresa May's use of the Royal prerogative to take us out of the EU,but the Royal prerogative has rarely tried to exercise that power and in both cases statute has exceeded prerogative...
The case of proclamations,1610... Was decided that the King by his proclamation cannot change any part of the common law or statute.
The case of fire brigades Union,1995... It would be surprising if prerogative powers could be used to frustrate the will of parliament expressed in a statute.
If a judge sought prior cases,which from my expensive experience judges often do,then the 2 cases where the Royal prerogative was exposed and competed with a statute ,the statute was deemed the higher power.
If May tries to use the Royal Prerogative it will certainly be subject to judicial review,this allows the actions of ministers,including the PM,to be challenged in the courts on the basis that the PM did not have the power to act in such a way or that the action was unreasonable or the power was exercised in a procedural unfair way,whatever the outcome of the judicial review it will also be subject to appeal.
This case ,because it questions the constitutional arrangements of the U.K.,will undoubtably be heard ultimately by our Supreme Court,don't hold your breath this could run for many years( up to 2020,hehe)
KudosDave
' any member state may decide to withdraw from the union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.
Leavers are placing a lot of faith in Theresa May's use of the Royal prerogative to take us out of the EU,but the Royal prerogative has rarely tried to exercise that power and in both cases statute has exceeded prerogative...
The case of proclamations,1610... Was decided that the King by his proclamation cannot change any part of the common law or statute.
The case of fire brigades Union,1995... It would be surprising if prerogative powers could be used to frustrate the will of parliament expressed in a statute.
If a judge sought prior cases,which from my expensive experience judges often do,then the 2 cases where the Royal prerogative was exposed and competed with a statute ,the statute was deemed the higher power.
If May tries to use the Royal Prerogative it will certainly be subject to judicial review,this allows the actions of ministers,including the PM,to be challenged in the courts on the basis that the PM did not have the power to act in such a way or that the action was unreasonable or the power was exercised in a procedural unfair way,whatever the outcome of the judicial review it will also be subject to appeal.
This case ,because it questions the constitutional arrangements of the U.K.,will undoubtably be heard ultimately by our Supreme Court,don't hold your breath this could run for many years( up to 2020,hehe)
KudosDave
Last edited: