He obviously doesn't read our thread, we've lambasted Cameron on many occasions for his stupidity in holding the referendum.Not normally a fan of this chap but this is a good one.
Avoid if you have sensitive ears.
https://youtu.be/oFxZ-rPPYd8
.
He obviously doesn't read our thread, we've lambasted Cameron on many occasions for his stupidity in holding the referendum.Not normally a fan of this chap but this is a good one.
Avoid if you have sensitive ears.
https://youtu.be/oFxZ-rPPYd8
Well my son worked there.....But to be fair I can't prove he's my son. The ex wife did put it about a bit.Got any proof for any of that?
The GFA was clearly made for an Ireland and UK within the EU and is only set in stone in that context. Nothing, absolutely nothing is ever set in stone for eternity.The only party who is terrified of a hard border is the EU. The Irish on both sides are perfectly happy with the way things are at the moment, as is the UK government. The GFA is a binding legal agreement ratified by the UN and is set in stone, with the Republic and GB signing up to it. The GFA requires a seamless and frictionless border. Any move by the EU to impose border controls would be in breach of this legal agreement. In any case, how would they achieve this in practical terms? The EU has no military, the republic is legally constrained from border controls, and the UK government will not put troops on the border on the EU's behalf as they are also similarly constrained.
The open border makes a mockery of the three pillars which the EU trumpets so loudly. This is the true reason why the EU are so terrified of brexit, and why it is such a thorn in their side.
Goods "not approved" by the EU can pour across the border. Likewise goods from all across the world can be made available in the Republic without the huge EU tariffs. Does anyone think the hordes of Mediterranean refugees will suddenly all pile into small boats and land on the shores of the Republic to get into the UK?
That's not going to happen, so there is no reason for anyone in the UK or the Republic to be fearful.
It's the EU that is wetting itself over this.
Just one part of your argument doesn't ring true.The only party who is terrified of a hard border is the EU. The Irish on both sides are perfectly happy with the way things are at the moment, as is the UK government. The GFA is a binding legal agreement ratified by the UN and is set in stone, with the Republic and GB signing up to it. The GFA requires a seamless and frictionless border. Any move by the EU to impose border controls would be in breach of this legal agreement. In any case, how would they achieve this in practical terms? The EU has no military, the republic is legally constrained from border controls, and the UK government will not put troops on the border on the EU's behalf as they are also similarly constrained.
The open border makes a mockery of the three pillars which the EU trumpets so loudly. This is the true reason why the EU are so terrified of brexit, and why it is such a thorn in their side.
Goods "not approved" by the EU can pour across the border. Likewise goods from all across the world can be made available in the Republic without the huge EU tariffs. Does anyone think the hordes of Mediterranean refugees will suddenly all pile into small boats and land on the shores of the Republic to get into the UK?
That's not going to happen, so there is no reason for anyone in the UK or the Republic to be fearful.
It's the EU that is wetting itself over this.
So ask yourself this why would the owner go back to employing locals when after Brexit he has access to non EU immigrants, which the Government has already confirmed the numbers of can be turned up or down as required?But the locals were already working there.They all got finished to be replaced by zero hours agency staff from Poland.
The locals did exactly the same job, but for better wages and not to get sent home without pay when it was raining.
Amusing post, I have however deleted the post it responds to and replaced it with another #38785Well my son worked there.....But to be fair I can't prove he's my son. The ex wife did put it about a bit.
Not that I trust the government...But the point of being able to adjust immigration up and down is to fill the jobs the locals can't do.So ask yourself this why would the owner go back to employing locals when after Brexit he has access to non EU immigrants, which the Government has already confirmed the numbers of can be turned up or down as required?
And on past performance they have no intention of reducing?
At least that's something many of us agree on!I'm hoping for a Labour government by the way.
I want a Labour government too but for the life of me I think it will be a disaster if they assume power outside the EU and carry the blame the Tory party should haveNot that I trust the government...But the point of being able to adjust immigration up and down is to fill the jobs the locals can't do.
I'm hoping for a Labour government by the way.
I'm one of the Labour voters that want Brexit (Jeremy being another)
From the begining - you wrote: ""Sam Delaneys show as **** as it was, was totally independent of RT "I'm not back tracking. Although I'm starting to wonder if English is your first language.
Let me help you out.
As time went by, we were astounded by the freedom we were given. Some of the stuff we broadcast on News Thing was so juvenile, offensive and, sometimes, terrible that we expected to be kicked out at any moment. But we rarely saw the boss; we rarely had any interaction with the channel at all. That was almost suspicious in itself. Everyone on News Thing had worked for terrestrial channels for years; none of us had ever experienced such laissez-faire management.
and for you especially
Conspiracy theorists – and even some mainstream journalists – began to accuse us of being part of what they called Putin’s propaganda machine. This seemed laughable to us. For a start, we had complete editorial independence. Plus, everyone involved in making the show was essentially left of centre, your typical metropolitan liberal dickhead types (including me). Our output was often dumb and sweary, but usually balanced and pretty moderate in its views. We criticised Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn equally. The show was consistently pro-remain. The channel’s marketing slogan was: “Question more”. It was true that programmes such as Going Underground or George Galloway’s weekly discussion show liked to challenge what they saw as the lazy bias of western neoliberals; by comparison, News Thing was positively wishy-washy and mainstream.
Hopefully that wasn't too long for you to read.
There is as yet another scenario. ..linking two of these strands together. Assuming that the UK seeks to fill it's it's low value positions with low cost Indian and African immigrants and then treat them to the type of conditions as specified in that carrot farm. What is to stop them taking the ferry to Larne, and getting on the bus to Dublin and the EU, where they will be able to avail of human rights.? So a border between alternative employment models will be forced to exist. This is one of the four freedoms of the EU.The GFA was clearly made for an Ireland and UK within the EU and is only set in stone in that context. Nothing, absolutely nothing is ever set in stone for eternity.
The departure from the EU of the UK with Northern Ireland clearly means a very different set of conditions which the UN will no doubt recognise and accept.
Quite how the border conditions will pan out none of us know, but it's certain that the EU will not tolerate completely open access.
.
why would they want to go to Dublin in the first place?There is as yet another scenario. ..linking two of these strands together. Assuming that the UK seeks to fill it's it's low value positions with low cost Indian and African immigrants and then treat them to the type of conditions as specified in that carrot farm. What is to stop them taking the ferry to Larne, and getting on the bus to Dublin and the EU, where they will be able to avail of human rights.? So a border between alternative employment models will be forced to exist. This is one of the four freedoms of the EU.
To avail themselves of human rights protection.why would they want to go to Dublin in the first place?
I will try to ring Jeremy again and ask him.I want a Labour government too but for the life of me I think it will be a disaster if they assume power outside the EU and carry the blame the Tory party should have
And by the way what is the logic if you want Brexit of having Foreign workers do British Worker's jobs?
How do you balance those two diametrically opposed viewpoints?
What a Fine moral stance, that is certainly not Socialist.
On the one hand we oppose free movement
On the other hand retain the right to not employ locals as we don't want either to train of pay them properly so it therefore is OK to exploit foreigners as they don't matter as human beings?
human rights protection?....... in DUBLIN ?????To avail themselves of human rights protection.
.
I'll leave Danidl to answer.human rights protection?....... in DUBLIN ?????
GASP!!!
Under WTO rules you cannot avoid a hard boder,thats not the EU rules it is WTO rules...by hard Brexit it is the UK that is choosing to leave under WTO.They do say that technology will have caught up by the time we need it to. ie in a couple of years.
I think this hard border nonsense is a wrinkle thrown in by the EU. A dangerous one too. Peace was hard fought for.
We don't want a hard border and niether does EIRE.
Under WTO rules you cannot avoid a hard boder,thats not the EU rules it is WTO rules...by hard Brexit it is the UK that is choosing to leave under WTO.
KudosDave