Unfortunately, this thread has descended to mudslinging in public. It does credit to no one. There are events that happened in the past which clearly still raise high emotions, anger those concerned and will probably never be resolved to everyone's satisfaction.
In a public forum, there will be those who find this amusing and others who think it is quite pathetic.
I think it is time to move on for the benefit of the industry and more importantly, the customer.
As a customer, I'd much rather that bad news was discussed out in the open than covered up. Coming from the IT industry there is too much of a culture of problem denial and burying bad news and disputes which is thankfully comparatively absent in e-bikes. I do appreciate it might affect John more as it could cost him sales, but not facing up to bad news does no one any favours in the long run.
Ezee were a close second for my upgrade to Wisper, but lost the business as I could clearly see in 2008/9 there was a customer service problem caused by miscommunication/disputes between dealers and Mr Ching.
The average e-bike customers is no fool and can read between the lines. I wasn't even sure then TBH, despite the wealth of information on here who
was the UK dealer for Ezee bikes!
However I
don't think Mr Ching was at all acting maliciously - perhaps I know a bit more about how he thinks in business, he comes from the same country and Chinese ancestry as my late father (well it was the same country when they were both born
)
What he is more guilty of is overestimating the amount of resources required for customer service whilst trying to expand the customer base worldwide, and thus overstretching himself.
At the same time Wisper appeared to concentrate on reliability as much as innovation, concentrating on some core markets (the UK and NZ) and most importantly customer service, whilst 50 cycles concentrated on European bikes- even then they had some issues with these such as the bizzare choice to use 32 spoked wheels on some Kahlkoffs, and the early Wispers having less robust wheels.
Even with e-bikes, Mr Amstrong was right to an extent "its not about the bike" - its long term reliability, and customer service that matters most! When it came to dealing with the problems/bad news, Wisper and David
consistently came out on top, engaged in dialogue with forum users here (whilst other dealers/manfacturers walked away and/or actively discouraged their staff from discussion).
David and his colleagues came across as approachable and dedicated in both UK and China.
At the same time, the intrepid Mr Ching often gave the impression he was always off jet-setting in foreign nations and pitching his latest project - whilst others were left to do the customer service job but weren't always brought to the right level of scrutiny and assessment. I doubt this was his intention at all, but for a variety of reasons (not even that much to do with nationalities and cultures) you simply can't afford to take your eye off the ball in a small business.
More importantly the culture of frank discussion on this forum has
raised the bar for everyone..
A couple of years ago I would have hesitated to recommend an e-bike to anyone other than an engineer - not because they were rubbish but due to the lack of timely support. Things have got better since then - though there is still room for improvement - but this forum and the discussion on it help keep the industry sharp and competitive. I feel that if the bad news had been covered up more there wouldn't be the level of progress and innovation there is today.