Andy ; with respect your posts are often unusualWait up, the "know-it-alls" will swoop in like vultures.....watch out for it!!
I did not see any put downs, I did not mention any names either, so where is the problem? Could you be so Kind as to point that out.Andy ; with respect your posts are often unusual
I am an investigator by trade (not police though ) so I am a very evidence based person.
Show me evidence to prove your narrative and I'm sold. I'm open minded and well aware received wisdom is just that. Engineers and physicists etc discover or hone understandings daily.
However, don't expect me or anyone sensible to believe a theory that contradicts current best practice or knowledge without serious evidence.
A part of the skill of getting new ideas to gain traction is also How you give that message and not just What you say ie communication skills.
Pompousness, derision, put downs, self aggrandising, deliberate obfuscation, not answering questions asked and so forth. These are the trade marks of the bully, the delusional, the foolish and the internet troll.
So let's not go there then, eh?
I think that we apparently live in two totally different worlds..... (Thank the good Lord for that!)I'll start with I suspect you of wilfully misunderstanding to be honest..
However let's do this just the once eh old chap?
" not see any put downs,"
Oh well, if that is your attitude to the sentence and post as a whole then I can only presume that it logically follows that you DID see "pompousness, derision, self aggrandising "
In your your own post.
"I did not mention any names either, so where is the problem"
No problem , me neither. Nor did I mention names. Or even the mentioning of names.
So your point was answering a question that was not asked. Obvuscation mlud. Or deviation for the radio four listeners
Did you in some way "feel" that you were being addressed personally?
Um. Yeah. You responded to my post
"But with regard to disk brakes and squealing, which is what this topic is about, just by observing how they are mounted, and being an engineer for a great many years now, I do believe that I can demonstrate to most people exactly how disks need to be used and why.
Though I will admit that an inkling on how metal behaves when hot might prove helpful as well.
Heavy people, aggressive riding, long down hill braking, can probably easily exceed 500°F on almost any bike,though I have not got the equipment to measure the temperature, as they cool down as fast as they get hot. Putting the disk through quick cycles of temperature change...
Let me say, that on several bikes with disk brakes, I have never had squealing, except when I once accidentally maladjusted the pads, one pad was touching the disk without the brakes being used!.....never when correctly adjusted!"
Well, okay. Super duper.
Please do explain further . Preferably briefly and in a single post. With evidence.
For example, on a spoked bike wheel, the spokes are arranged, in tension, to keep the wheel stable in forward, backward, and even with pressure while riding, from either side.Same as awol - i'm basing this on the direction of the spokes
I forgot to mention the quiz results, my apologies to all concerned:-For example, on a spoked bike wheel, the spokes are arranged, in tension, to keep the wheel stable in forward, backward, and even with pressure while riding, from either side.
If you look at probably most, but certainly not all disk brake rotors (I am speaking generally), they are also made with spokes, thin pieces of metal, that connect the outer "circle" of metal, to the hub, which they are usually connected to with either usually 6 or possibly 8 small screws.
Now if a bike wheel was spoked to tension the spokes in only one direction, not both, in reality it would fold up immediately, if it was used.
Well the brake disk is basically the same.
If the brake is used with the spokes pointing in the direction of travel, such as here:-
View attachment 31744
I am assuming for the moment that this disk has been photographed from the left of the bike, looking to the right, so that if moving forward, the disk is rotating anti clockwise.
Under heavy or long term (longer than say 30 seconds or so) usage of the brake, on say a steep downhill section in particular, the metal will get very hot. I have even seen disks (not on my bike!) that were almost black/blue from heat.
This heat softens up the metal (probably only) temporarily, and when the disk is used as in the first picture, it can form tiny waves, which when cooled, may cause the brakes to vibrate in an audible manner. Simply because the spokes are put into compression when braking, which I believe causes the distortion.
The thinner the spokes, the higher the temperature, the longer the heat is generated, the worse the effects.
I have not had brake squeal myself, but possibly, if the squealing disk is reversed, MAYBE if run hot again, my theory says that possibly the noise will be either reduced or even eliminated.
THEORY NOT TESTED YET!
But someone here might try it on say the front brake only, as that is mechanically the easy one to reverse.
Obviously, good quality designs in a good metal will still handle it better than a cheaper, thinner, low quality version.
Some disks are made quite thin, to save weight I believe, these will probably deform first. Guessing only.
The thicker disks will usually handle any heating effects far better in my limited experience. And although I have not bothered to weigh them and compare, the difference between thin and thick, it will probably be less than the weight of any small change some of us carry about in our pockets. e.g. Its not worth worrying about the difference in weight if you are just an average rider, like myself.
Now on a brake disk that runs the other way around, like this one:-
View attachment 31745
The heating may be identical, but the spokes are put into tension, stabilizing the outer ring from micro distortion far better.
Some disks are made so that they are stabilized, like a wheel, in both directions, these of course can be installed either way round with no problems, like this one for example, but are probably a few grams heavier still:-
View attachment 31747
Now if you look at this disk, you can see that each spoke is double, forming a very stiff and reliable double connection to each screw holding the disk, with the hub being made of far thicker (heavier!) metal. Thus reducing the chance or even totally preventing the distortion and therefore squealing.
I hope I have managed to make the reasons easy to understand, but if anyone has questions still, I will do my best to answer them.
regards to all
PS. I forgot to mention that I ride a fairly cheap bike and the disk brakes and calipers are definitely not of the highest quality or price. When the bike was delivered, either my bike or my mate's, one disk was reversed to the other!! The other bike had both disks (IMHO) reversed! Neither myself or my mate, and we both ride in the hills with the dogs, and it the town, have had no problems of squealing brakes. But I have had to repair the adjuster on the on the front brake, as it was plastic, as the Sun had got to it. As you can see here:-
View attachment 31748
I put some stainless steel parts together and replaced that plastic, and it now looks like this:-
View attachment 31749
Its hard to believe its the same brake and if anyone who has had the same problems, I have written an easy repair procedure that I can send anyone if required.
It really is simple, all you need are a few simple hand tools, and a stainless steel 8mm Allen screw, or a similar sized Torx screw, and a big SS washer and some 2 component glue!
Not according to Shimano:I forgot to mention the quiz results, my apologies to all concerned:-
Answers for the Disk Brake Quiz are:-
1. Wrong. 2. Wrong. 3. Immaterial most likely. 4. Wrong. 5. Correct. 6. Immaterial.
7. Immaterial 8. Wrong. 9. Wrong. 10. Correct.
Assuming that my method is correct, look around you just to see haw many are wrongly, from an engineering point of view, wrongly mounted. IMHO most of them!!
Regards to all
I sure willI think that we apparently live in two totally different worlds..... (Thank the good Lord for that!)
You appear to be looking for an argument with someone, that's what I would call cyber bullying!
Please be so kind as to simply and permanently ignore all my topics, posts and comments in the future on any of the many forums that I frequent.
Many thanks for your full understanding in this matter.
I agree. In fact I think that the relevant posts should be removed.My Shimano disc works fine, is fitted according to the manufacturers instructions and has a direction arrow. According to Andy it is wrong though.
Now, maybe Shimano is incorrect but there must be a good reason that they state the importance of rotor rotation so I'm staying with that.
I think it is inapropriate for a member to give advice to others that goes against manufacturers instructions, especially with braking systems. If an individual wants to experiment knowing all the facts then thats up to them .
I think that the fact that he's not responded says it all.I agree. In fact I think that the relevant posts should be removed.
We have no way of knowing whether Andy is a serious poster with a good understanding of engineering, or a wind blowing troll.
His posts could pose serious danger to someone who just happens across this site.