I agree but the Albanian ambassador is quite right, UK should have an official channel that people can use to apply.£28 flight vs £5000! Not hard to figure out why, is it? ;-)
There is a legal way its called the UKVI..
home-affairs.ec.europa.eu
www.gbnews.com
www.express.co.uk
They were first baby steps. Electric buses are just about workable technology now.
Just One Council spends £8.7M of the publics money on junk Bin Lorries (not buses). How much across the country?. Pitiful baby steps for the money. Tell you what, if greenies really believed in these, why don't they sponsor them out of their own pockets? No, why not, oh yes, coz they know they're junk! Cheers
Cleverer people than me made those plans. I am sure they know their numbers. Even I know that burning fossil fuels makes our air unbreathable on our congested roads. A lot of people die of lung diseases well before their time. As for the rest, breathing diesel fumes shorten your life. There is a pent up demand to get rid of diesel buses and lorries as soon as possible. It's a no brainer for city dwellers. As most of us live in cities, that is the majority. The push for cleaner air is an absolute priority. Btw, even diesel bin lorries are fairly expensive.Just One Council spends £8.7M of the publics money on junk Bin Lorries (not buses). How much across the country?. Pitiful baby steps for the money. Tell you what, if greenies really believed in these, why don't they sponsor them out of their own pockets? No, why not, oh yes, coz they know they're junk! Cheers
"Cleverer people", don't you believe it
youtube.com
I neither know nor care about where you live. I care about where I live, England, where 86% live in Towns and Cities, just 14% in villages or isolation. So proportionally, those yokels don't count enough to counter by far the best policy for the great majority.
Irrelevance, not the major problem and affecting only a small minority, plus the fact that underground travel is optional. No-one is forced into employment that necessitates undergound travel as the only option. In 63 years living in London as an adult, much of it working centrally, I've never commuted in the underground.
Only to those who don't have the brains to see the urgent priority, which is to drastically reduce city street exhaust pollution. That diesel lorries are both cheaper and more efficient is once again a total irrelevance, when they not only don't solve the problem, they make it far worse, and much worse than any other type of diesel lorry.
We lived in London for a while when I first came to the UK. The air was already unbreatheable compared to France. That's why we moved to Southend. The air here is about 3 times cleaner than in London.
You keep contradicting yourself, the facts and basic logic..
)
If the air was "unbreathable" you would have been unalive. Pls try to stay logical and avoid hyperbole.
www.london-fire.gov.uk
www.iqair.com
Ask any Londoner, see how many agree that pollution is the same in London and Southend.
Well, your "pollution hotspot" is improving..
Wrong, try to get your brain working before commenting.
It's certainly very much better than in the old days of lethal smog, but nothing like good enough yet, as our epidemic of asthma shows. Sometimes lethal to the young, it's far too early to be complacent about past improvements.
Wrong. Diesel efficiency IS an irrelevance when diesel usage compounds the problem we are trying to solve as our FIRST priority. And diesel refuse lorries ARE much worse polluting than those driving through briefly or switched off while delivering, simply because they run continuously to power regularly compressing their load and raising and lowering the bins even during their substantial periods stationary. At least know a subject before passing judgement..
Wrong. The UK and the British parliament claim to be operationally a democracy, making their decisions on the basis of majorities. So the 14% absolutely do not count against the 86% when a decision is directly contradictory. Remember Brexit when the margin was barely 4%, but still large enough to carry the vote?
youtube.com
youtube.com
