November 21, 201312 yr The *relaxed* Netherlands bike riding is due to lack of worrying about 44tons of metal heading their way at 30mph plus! This is not relevant though, none of the death accidents we are speaking of involve 30 mph trucks. They almost all involve trucks doing tight left turns at low speeds, and none that I've seen details of involve 44 ton artics, they've mostly been 6 and 8 wheel rigids of much lower weights. Speed and weight have played no part, the factors have been high driver positions, blind spots, cyclists on the left in the truck's own lane or misunderstandings at the intersection of painted CS lanes with vehicle left turns.
November 21, 201312 yr Couple of sites to check out: RoadPeace.org and Seemesaveme.com No thanks, too much confused thinking, warped by emotion.
November 21, 201312 yr I was on a bus in Manchester this morning and 1 cyclist drove towards the bus on the wrong side of a busy main road, as the bus was pulling in to the bus stop - and tried to cycle between the bus and the pavement. Two minutes later, as the bus was travelling through a green light, again just about to pull in to the bus stop on the left just past the lights, a cyclist ran the red light on the cross-roads from the left, and turned left again alongside the left of the bus. How he wasn't killed I don't know. I was in awe of the driver who managed to avoid both cyclists who seemed bent on suicide.
November 21, 201312 yr I don't quite understand your post. Do you mean the bus/taxi lane is on the left of the cycle lane? If so, this is not uncommon, I have one nearby. Nowhere is it said buses or taxis have to overtake anyone to their right, so there's no automatic illegallity. Regardless, the law is as I stated it, taken from one of the government's own sites, to be legal, drivers must ensure anyone they overtake on the left is aware of their intention and consents. Obviously impossible to achieve, this is typical of so much of our ill-conceived and poorly drafted modern law. . Forget the cyle lane for a minute. A two lane road originally intended for all traffic. Now, the left lane (nearest the kerb) is now a bus and taxi lane. Other vehicles prohibited. You have many in London. My point was about undertaking, not overtaking. Buses and taxis undertaking vehicles to their right all day long. The system, roadway is designed for this and as such my conclusion is that it must be legal to undertake.
November 21, 201312 yr Thanks for the reply SRS. The law is clear though, yes it is legal to pass on the left, but subject to the condition I stated. Since that condition is virtually impossible to meet, almost all such overtakes* are illegal. As ever there is an official blind eye operating, expediency, but in the event of a collision between an undertaking vehicle and the one it is passing, the undertaking driver will be found at fault in the courts, since patently the driver being passed on the left had not seen and understood the undertakers intention as the law requires. *The law speaks of overtaking on the left, undertaking isn't used since it's a term with a completely different meaning. . Edited November 21, 201312 yr by flecc
November 21, 201312 yr Paraphrasing flecc, "trucks involved not 44 tons, not doing 30mph, rigid, something about no of wheels, etc, etc..". Ooh, picky, picky, but as we're being so *relevant*, let's hear more about 99?, 1930's Channel island Bike Tax Discs, that's so much more 2013 City of 10million! :-D Edited November 21, 201312 yr by MikeyBikey
November 21, 201312 yr Not picky Mike, why concentrate on speed when speed is not involved so not relevant? It's a fair criticism. The media is full of suggestions that are in no way relevant to the current death accident problem, so as cyclists surely we should not be adding to that useless verbiage. And as for tax discs etc, that was a different discussion on ways of insuring bikes anywhere, not London specific, so your comment on London's size isn't relevant to that or the accident discussion. Both my comments you quoted were entirely relevant to the particular discussion involved. .
November 21, 201312 yr The law speaks of overtaking on the left, undertaking isn't used since it's a term with a completely different meaning. . And yet the result of the one can (and does, as we have sadly seen) lead to the other:(
November 21, 201312 yr I had an intresting discussion with my dad today as we drove around the elephant and castle in his car, he being a motorist didn't know that it has a cycle lane running around the outside roads that keeps cyclists out of the deadly mess. We also spotted around 15 cyclists ignoring the cycle route and putting themselves in danger without any need(that's just in the minute or so going around it by car at 8pm). My dad's reaction went from "this road is totally unsafe for you to cycle, tfl should do something about it..." to "so they have a safe route they just don't use it, idiots", he also went on to say more cycle paths should be on the pavements and pointed out some roads that "have huge pavements" as our last holiday we visited Cologne which has them in the middle of pavements and cycling is very safe, he said it might be dangerous for pedestrians but not as life threatening as a truck to a cyclist and people will just learn to listen for bike bells as he did in about 30min of walking in Cologne. As for the speed discussion above lots of cycling safety-ish campaigners are using what has happened to get a boost on some agenda they had been pushing before. Most who want the speed of cars reduced to 10mph in areas are just people who hate cars and know it would force them off the road. It's easy to spot that it isn't a cycle safety drive when they want the speed on motorways(on which cycling is illegal) cut also. I think the London cyclist evolution is much different to the other cyclist evolution. I'm with the point that cycling has always been a hobby or sport BUT the London cyclist is purely from money(or the lack of it) and it is all about saving money against the cost of the tube or buses or congestion charge or gym or whatever. Lots of cyclists after the first month or 2 enjoy it but lots don't and so ride about with the start point of "this pile of junk owes me £££ and I will ride it so I'm not paying the tube". The riding style then comes from a number of factors, those switching from a car to a bike will have picked up lots of London cyclist tips from observing the worst of cycling from jumping lights they had been sat at too taking gaps they can't, now they cycle them things won't matter, those switching from a bus will learn from other cyclists on the road as watching others go unchecked rubs off on you, those switching from the tube have never seen the surface so do whatever they want. Many will ask the staff in halfords or evans the important question "what do I need to be a safe cyclist?" and be told "we have high vis and helmets and lights, lots of cyclists buy these". That's just about it, £200-300 hybrid bike with £50 of safety gear and you can't be killed, you can't even have a car crash like they showed you in the driving lessons as you don't drive so win win.
November 22, 201312 yr Like debating with a Juggernaut. "juggernaut in colloquial English usage is a literal or metaphorical force regarded as mercilessly destructive and unstoppable. In British English, it is also used to mean a large heavy truck or articulated lorry. Originating ca. 1850, the term is a metaphorical reference to the Hindu Ratha Yatra temple car, which apocryphally was reputed to crush devotees under its wheels." from Wiki. Never fear, they can be deflected with 3rd party insurance. ;-)
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.