Search results

before the Gina Miller's case in the High Court, we all agreed that parliament should represent the will of the people. After parliament has voted for brexit, we all agreed that parliament should now scrutinize the process. Are you saying that the parliament should hand back the job to the people?

I do particularly like the idea of 'keeping the equivalence in key areas including competition, trade and social policy'. it seems to me that remainers are going to get the deal they want, we are getting to keep the status quo for possibly as long as 3 years after brexit. Plenty of time to see...

Hello RevBob, Jim sent Peter's motor back last week.

only reason is when the cable is too short to form the drip loop.

good job that we are humans, not machines. You can of course put your own interpretation on the observed local results of the referendum. If you chuck the known voting results into a machine, you can't escape the conclusion that the will of the people is brexit. There is no other way to...

by deduction. principle: the will of the people is represented by MPs. fact: the majority of MPs voted for A50 bill which enables brexit deduction: the will of the people is brexit.

they are of course minding that about 2 out of 3 conservative seats and labour seats are brexit territories. so yes, they reflect the will of the people.

then it's a minefield, not icebergs.

people see a 1000W motor as naturally more capable than a 250W one. Who can blame them? It's difficult to get the point across that 1000W DD motors are only good for very limited circumstances, high speed (20+mph) and low gradient (less than 5%).

and still is as it is confirmed by the majority of MPs. Have you you detected some significant change?

Hello John, The motor you bought is a gearless motor, AKA DD (direct drive) motor. They are great when you ride at 25+mph but consume a lot more energy at speed below 25mph compared to crank drives or hub motors with internal gearbox. There are good geared hub motors on the market. I sell three...

Yes, that's the will of the people, until brexit is brexit. BTW, what icebergs? the economic data shows no iceberg.

I can actually point you to what is making sense as I was taught in high school (when I did my bac). You start with basic beliefs (principles and axioms) from then you derive further knowledge by deduction. etc.. Anyone can apply these steps to brexit but where is the fun?

why should you? the posters on this thread don't care much for sense.

No, I tried. I syringe the grease into the cable channel, clean off on the outside, the I make a 'hat' for the spindle with self amalgamating tape. I then put the rubber cover for the wheel nut back on. If the water gets inside the rubber cover, it will runs off the hat...

that's how discoveries are made. The history of physics is full of stories like that.

No, I think we'll claim it is within our rights because the treaty did not make arrangements for rescinding A50.

If the UK wants to rescind the letter, the matter will be decided by the ECJ, not 27 remaining members.

then the 52% will vote them out. remainers will have nothing to worry about.

Are you sure? The sun is supposed to turn itself into a red giant star in about 5 bn years and the earth is going to be burnt into ashes.