At the moment I ride with a smart BMS, connected during discharge this allows monitoring of the cell voltages in real time. Since it’s useless during the charge cycle as it cannot balance the battery unless want to wait several days. Again, this be just another reason to remove BMS, once cell loggers are attached.
The Low Voltage Cut-off: I intend to utilise the controller, shuts down at 3.1 volts.
Long term the smart BMS, become redundant with LVC alarm cell loggers to warn when within a set voltage limit. At 70kms the battery can remain above 36volt, lowest level seen were just below 36v on a 50km ride mostly up hill. Digress, on that occasion I stopped at a Shell petrol station and accessed an exterior socket (with permission). Why duplicate via a standard BMS, given the risks associated with those to a battery. Less components, less risk, etc.
Shortening the life of the cells. The starting voltage is 8.10Ah and this decreases as the battery holds more charge. I don’t figure how the cells degrade faster it’s a 41.6Ah battery with 8Ah isn’t that big a current comparison that size of battery. Also I never charge to 42 volts, always 80% of voltage capacity.
I find the system at present far superior. The future version with less components, present time produces a better charge, more even charge and the equaliser is available to expand (even use 5s) and swap between bikes.
Why have a BMS, system that’s fixed to one bike and one that cannot handle a large battery. There arises at certain Ah, these standard BMS systems are a waste of funds and serious risk damaging a battery.