It's good to be sceptical, and there's misinformation on both sides, but PwC (who are obsessively, amorally and exclusively interested in what they can make out of any situation) are amongst many investors who say so
why would any uk pm have to agree to a withdrawal deal? I wont get into the semantics of the small majority, advisory referendum etc etc. But - by analogy - if your wife says, lets have a suicide pact instead of a divorce and your daughter agrees with her would you say "well yes that makes sense then" or would you say "f%$£ off, you're mad". Brexit is a suicide pact between the disengaged disenfranchised and ultra right wing tory nut jobs/hedge funds. I feel as inclined to honour the referendum on it as I do to take the advice of the homeless psychotic down the road on what i should do with my life who, bless his soul, incidentally had the same right to vote on brexit than me.
Even were there to be long-term benefit (and I feel that is very unlikely), the actual process of leaving will cause a shock. You just have to look at the uncertainty involved which simply will not, cannot, be resolved in the short term.
that's their job, to deal with consequences of international treaties that we signed and make sure that brexit is orderly.
it's nothing like a suicide pack.
Labour is an unthinkable prospect. An MP convicted of preventing the course of justice, another employing a convicted drug dealer and also a proven liar, millionaires masquerading as ordinary people’s representatives, hell bent on emptying the pockets of working people and filling those of wasters. Just a snap-shot of Labour.
And I think wind up toy nations such as Ireland and the majority of the other 27 will be wanting us back. These countries “dance a fancy jig” in return for the coins that the EU throw into their collection baskets. They are, to a significant extent, reliant on the positive monetary contributions that the U.K. makes. They don't like to admit it, but in reality, many of the EU 27 nations are nothing.
You have, to state the obvious, a very bleak view of the EU (whoring nations dancing for coins). Much of the consumer and employee protection regulation on this little thatcherite coal mine of a country of ours wouldn't have happened without it. Nor euro tunnel or concord or our current car industry and a host of other good stuff. How about not using a matrix of nations and instead focusing on what's good for you, your family culturally, environmentally,existentially? I cannot believe you can possibly look at May, Reese mogg and the other manically self obsessed that constitute the UK "government" without realising it promises something much darker than malta
Well, I have to tell you, since I woke up to the fact that I share a country with 17million voters who look at Boris or Farage and see our next leaders, I feel very much as if I have been on a national level coerced into an arranged marriage with decidedly demented others
whereas those who are in denial are usually characterised by a complete lack of anxiety..
Yes, I'd heard all this information before it was posted here. But it still could be a shell to cover any continental company shipping between any two ports, Ramsgate just being a nominal company base. Those continentals, the Dutch especially, already have ships.
Much of it we wrote in the first place, particularly human rights legislation.
And then refused to put it into law until the EU adopted it and made it mandatory!
The U.K. is one of the most compliant nations within the EU, with others being fined heavily for not adopting legislation.
This reply has no relevance to my post about who was to blame for the quoted instances.
Someone, sometime published a table on this forum of all the derogations and exemptions the uk had obtained,so no it is not the most compliant nation state. Not by a long shot.
