I agree on this, and have posted as such before. Though I'd like to see e-bikes enjoying widespread adoption, historical parallels tend to indicate it won't happen. Consumers are more likely to adopt the electric alternatives needing no personal effort as they become available in better forms, with cars as the first choice and mopeds winning second place. E-bikers are likely to be exactly those you specify, and very much a minority.From what I can see electric biking is very much a personal choice, be it made for environmental, health or financial reasons. People who have those issues at heart will naturally steer towards electric biking. Those that don’t seem unlikely to take up the electric bike call.
That's good. The only problem I see with these is the usual one of waterproofing, they need wrapping securely. Self amalgamating tape is good for that, also at Maplin. The rubber one is out of stock, but the silicone alternative is in stock and cheaper:Thanks flecc, you may have just solved my connector problem.
.
I daresay it's the designer view on the application. In their original application as microphone connectors on long leads, latching versions would be used on wandering connections which were subject to movement, snaking across studio floors as they do. Non-latching are for stationary connections of the sort that we use when charging, so they appear to be the right ones for the job. Most e-bikes could use the latching versions of course, their pin contacts are just as tight but there's more to get hold of when detaching.If it's not based on cost, then one wonders why the latching variety isn't used, as surely part of their design is to make a secure connection, as well as being easier to release, with them not being reliant on friction to hold them together.
This may not be as far away as you may think...If the market ever becomes big enough for a specific range of connectors to be designed and the bike component manufacturers like Shimano and SRAM start to manufacture components for e-bikes, we will get standardisation following, but I see little chance at the moment.
.
I disagree, as saying this is saying that the culture in the UK is incapable of evolving, and that people's attitudes are entrenched and immovable. I think a lot more people would have a go, if it were a) cheaper, b)better publicised, & c) presented as a thought through, neatly packaged technology.I agree on this, and have posted as such before. Though I'd like to see e-bikes enjoying widespread adoption, historical parallels tend to indicate it won't happen. Consumers are more likely to adopt the electric alternatives needing no personal effort as they become available in better forms, with cars as the first choice and mopeds winning second place. E-bikers are likely to be exactly those you specify, and very much a minority.
I think its more a marketing/sales than technical issue. Both of us found there are no e-bike dealers in this region with "proper" shops! I think we are also both engineers so building a bike from semi assembled bits in a carton isn't a massive issue but I know many who would find it a challenging task.I think a lot more people would have a go, if it were a) cheaper, b)better publicised, & c) presented as a thought through, neatly packaged technology.
I'm not saying that, since historically it was quite the opposite. It was precisely because attitudes do evolve that people do take advantage of advances in personal wealth and access to improved forms of transport. That is why the huge decade long boom in petrol assist on bikes with over a million on UK roads vanished so quickly, increased affluence and availability of scooters like the Vespa and Lambretta for most and cars for an increasing number killing the assisted bike market.I disagree, as saying this is saying that the culture in the UK is incapable of evolving, and that people's attitudes are entrenched and immovable.
I fully agree that the kids market is wide open for the taking, but our silly restrictive law prevents that happening. They are illegal for under 14 year olds, but under 14 is where the cycling kids are who might take it up. At 14 upwards it's too late, they've already got their eyes on the prospect of a moped at 16, and at 14 they are also getting more interested in the opposite sex, for which purpose bikes are more a nuisance than a convenience.making the whole thing more attractive to the kids, and there's lots of those sitting on bikes on street corners these days.
This is exactly what the market is like, and even in the three years existence of this site I've seen a number complete their entire e-bike ownership life cycle. The ability to buy and enjoy, a gradual loss of interest or changing circumstances reducing the usage, followed by giving them up.If, however, the market for e-bikes in the UK is as Footie and Flecc suppose, then it's somewhat bad news all round. Unless you have a large disposable income, chances are that you're only going to buy one or two e-bikes in your lifetime, leaving the industry, having at the moment a very small consumer base, in something of a cul-de-sac. This leads to companies going out of business, a lack of parts and servicing, and the eventual death of a yet another good idea.
I don't have an issue with the CBT (I think it may even have some gains in road safety) but what annoys me is how it expires after two years, implying the new rider somehow "unlearns" all their road experienceThat's very true Alex, but some of that is due to financial elements which change over time. Also restrictions like the CBT become more acceptable with time and become less of an impediment, and they've certainly been no impediment in my area where moped ownership by teens is very common, while cycling by them is virtually completely absent.