My suspicion is that you are able to put in more pedalling effort once your legs get warmed up after the first mile or two.Re 1.This would affect long trips as much as short ones surely? I do in fact charge immediately on return.
Re.2 ditto i.e. this doesn't explain why short trips use pro-rata 4 times as much power. My suspicion is that there is something wrong with the metric "watt-hours/mile/ft ascent" but I don't understand what![]()
Batteries will deliver more Amp-hours the less Amps you use. For example, a 10Ah battery can deliver 1 amp for 10 hours, but may only manage 10amps for 45 mins... or 20 amps for 15 mins. This means that hill climbing where the battery must deliver high currents for long intervals will have a disproportionately draining effect on the battery which won't be accounted for in the hours/mile/ft ascent metric.
As this thread has floated back into view once more, I thought I'd add on my battery charges graph which now contains 31 charges in total since the start of February. My battery is the orange blobs, and my wife's is the blue squares. The X axis is the number of LEDs showing on the battery before it went into the charger (0.5 = flashing, 0=cutoff reached), and the Y axis the the Ah absorbed by the battery (based on a charger efficiency of 85% as per my other post a few pages back).

As you can see, the battery meter on the panasonic batteries is surprisingly accurate. Each light extinguished seems to equate to about 2Ah of charge used up right down to the last LED remaining. I believe the flashing is supposed to indicate 10% or less remaining, but it seems to be more like 15% in practice.