Without taking exception to anyone in particular's point of view as we're all entitled to our opinions, I'd just like to add a voice of support to Flecc and his acutely accurate description of the make-up of London as it is today.
To those who think they know something of London but clearly don't from some of the views promulgated, I would say this: You cannot possibly understand London and comment objectively on its merits and demerits unless you have both lived there and other places elsewhere long-term.
Just picking up Mussels' point briefly, doesn't the LCC count? The LCC, (London County Council) was the representative body for over 75 years until it was replaced by the GLC.
From memory, Ken Livingstone's "Fares fair" policy of the early '80s was hugely popular with londoners but was curiously deemed illegal by the High Court after Bromley, Bexley or one of the other tory-controlled south London boroughs objected. That was an exercise only made possible through gerrymandering. Londoners were denied the benefits of a great transport policy because a few rich tories didn't actually have a tube station on their doorstep even though none of them would ever consider mixing with the proletariat on public transport, preferring to drive their gas-guzzling 4x4s up to Knightsbridge and park wherever they want, fines meaning nothing to them.
I firmly believe that, as politicians go, Ken Livingstone's heart is in the right place and he does actually care about London and Londoners. As for the tory buffoon, he cares not a jot for anyone other than himself but that's standard operating practice for the two tory parties with which this once-proud nation is now blessed.
Indalo