This might help with understanding. His summary seems to be that it's individual cell quality that leads to fires, though I only skipped through it so far:
Battery Fires
- Thread starter saneagle
- Start date
one thing that puzzles me a long time. I am amazed that nobody has thought of killing the electrolyte or one of the electrodes to prevent the thermal runaway.
That's what he explains in the video. Some cylindrical cells have tops that pop like fuses.
that's the anti-explosion device, just for controlled venting. You need to poison the electrolyte to stop the conduction through the electrolyte. If you act fast enough, that would prevent the electrolyte from heating up.
OK
OK, thanks. I have some Alphachloralose left over from the rats. I'll put some in my toolkit and chuck it on the battery when it catches fire. I never though of that.
thermal runaway in lithium battery is usually caused either by external short circuit (damaged BMS by overcharging for example) or internal short circuit (damaged separtator for example).
To improve the separator. manufacturers now re-inforce them with ceramics.
To improve the separator. manufacturers now re-inforce them with ceramics.
This is not a mature technology yet, is it. So many ways it can become unreliable or as in this case very dangerous. I was just reading an article in the Guardian about the experience of a Renault electric car owner being quoted £7500 for the replacement of the charging module in his car because it had burned out. Huge numbers of garages won't touch them.... Not surprised. A shock from an 800v battery is unlikely to leave you in a good state or even alive. The massive current available would be very unforgiving. I once got an 800v shock from a fat capacitor. A few milliamps. It wasn't nice. Threw me across the room. From a battery it would be a very different story.
I just bought a new car and thought about Electric power, but went petrol. Maybe by 2035 they will be better.
I'm wondering how the much talked about Toyota solid state batteries will turn out. Toyota have a history of announcing marvellous new tech that comes to nothing though. They are supposed to offer high energy density, rapid charging, many charge cycles and no risk of fire. If it is true it would be a revolution.
I just bought a new car and thought about Electric power, but went petrol. Maybe by 2035 they will be better.
I'm wondering how the much talked about Toyota solid state batteries will turn out. Toyota have a history of announcing marvellous new tech that comes to nothing though. They are supposed to offer high energy density, rapid charging, many charge cycles and no risk of fire. If it is true it would be a revolution.
Nissan have announced that they will have a solid state battery model on the road in 2028, and they have lead the way with lithium batteried e-car development from 2010 on.
I'm a very happy Nissan second generation Leaf owner for six years now and it, its two chargers and even its battery and inbuilt charging module will almost certainly outlive me, so I don't expect any large bills at all.
But e-cars are certainly not suitable for everyone. In fact they probably never will be in the way that ic cars have been, not just due to technical limitations but also due to the little realised ways that the market and society will be forced to change.
.
The range on those Leaf cars has really improved hasn't it. One of my sons bought a second hand e. car. Maybe a citroen? Not sure. He likes it, but the range is pretty short - about 60 miles. It isn't a problem. He only uses it to get to work - about ten miles, and he can charge it free in the office car park. It leaves his missus with the other car (IC) to get to work and drop the kids. Nissan at Sunderland has had massive success. It is a big employer in the North East and is supposed to be pretty much the most efficient car plant in Europe.... I think that's right. Heard or saw it somewhere. The people who work there seem to like it - which is pretty new in the UK car business. I've talked to some of them.
No need to feel guilty at all. I certainly don't. I use my car when it is the most efficient or practical transport, and at other times, I ride motorbikes (100 mpg) or my bike. My car only does about 6K or 7k a year. The one I just got rid of averaged 62 mpg over the last year (diesel) and the new one which has only done 760 miles so far, has averaged 56mpg since new.
The UK emits 1% of current co2 emissions. If Putin nuked the whole place next week, China's ever increasing power hunger would take up our entire emissions budget by next year. China emits 12.7 billion tonnes of co2 a year, which is around 30% of the whole world's emissions. That Swedish troll girl needs to get after them and stay away from here.
Indeed it has. The first 2010 model with a 24 kWh battery was good for just over 70 miles (claimed 90). The revision with a 30 kWh battery three years later was good for over 90 miles (claimed 124). Both good for 89mph top speed and 11.2 seconds 0 to 62mph.
The increased efficiency second generation Leaf of 2018 had a 40kWh battery and big upgrades in range and performance with 40% BHP increase. WLTP range when new of 168 miles which I was able to achieve with 13 miles left over in the two reserves. Top speed sensibly still at 89mph but acceleration 7.9 seconds 0 to 62mph.
The Leaf e+ sporty model of 2019 on has a 63kWh battery, double the original Leaf's power at 210 BHP, WLTP range of 220 miles. Top speed 98mph and 0 to 62mph at 7.3 seconds.
The earliest Leafs are mostly still good for 50 miles and I know of three locally, two with with wives using them for school runs, shopping etc., one with a retired man who bought it from his son and now uses it locally and also for the occasional 120 mile round trip to visit his son. That means a top up on each leg of the journey.
All summer ranges, winter markedly lower.
.
I need to watch the whole thing but it's late and I'm sleepy. So I'll leave that for tomorrow.
A related question for a newbie like me:
I'm pretty sure my Greenlance battery instructions' page says to charge the battery with it switched on (-). I think it's for extra security, since it says when the battery is 'on' it knows even more precisely not to overcharge it. (I need to give it another read, it's been a few weeks)
Is that how it should be and how most people charge their batteries? Intuition makes me think to charge it with the switch flipped to off (o).
A related question for a newbie like me:
I'm pretty sure my Greenlance battery instructions' page says to charge the battery with it switched on (-). I think it's for extra security, since it says when the battery is 'on' it knows even more precisely not to overcharge it. (I need to give it another read, it's been a few weeks)
Is that how it should be and how most people charge their batteries? Intuition makes me think to charge it with the switch flipped to off (o).
That's what it says on the instruction sheet my generic downtube battery arrived with.
That's what I've been doing with mine, which is why I found it odd. I will re-read the Greenlance instruction sheet tomorrow to make sure I'm not mixing things up.
I've occasionally charged my battery while switched on by mistake, but for the past three years I've nearly always charged it when off. I checked cell group voltage a couple of months ago, and they were:
4.195V, 4.195V, 4.198V, 4.192V, 4.197V, 4.193V, 4.196V, 4.192V, 4.189V, 4.191V
The general procedure to charge Chinese batteries is to put the jack in with the charger switched on because most have a permanently live charge socket and you need equal voltage when you connect, otherwise you get a spark, which can do some serious damage.
If your battery switch switches off the charging, that could be considered a bit safer, though it makes little difference as long as you connect with the charger switched on. With the charge socket switched off, you can connect with the charger switched on or off, then switch on the battery after connection to commence charging.
Personally, I'd always switch on both the battery and the charger before connecting, then there is no danger of a spark because there can't be any inrush current. When you connect with the battery charge socket switched off, then switch on after connection, there will still be an inrush, but you don't see it. Inrush is best avoided. It's caused when one of the devices has a large capacitor between the two wires. The capacitor charges instantly and draws a very high current, almost like a short circuit.
Last edited:
May I ask what battery do you have? I am looking for a battery for a while now and can't decide which to buy.
Related Articles
-
MTF Enterprises announces acquisition of EMU Electric Bikes- Started by: Pedelecs
-
Wisper 806T folding bike wins Which? ‘Best Buy’- Started by: Pedelecs
-
Sustrans calls for protected cycle lanes- Started by: Pedelecs
-
Amazon launch their first UK e-cargo micromobility hub- Started by: Pedelecs
