I'm afraid not. we were an overindulged unproductive society harbouring misguided delusions about being special. we are, after al, about to discover the hard way what happens to people who dont think before making important decisions in an interdependent reality. Those who voted brexit have just bought themselves something really interesting (the words an opportunity to become roadkill comes to mind).
Insult to Democracy
- Thread starter (NoLongerRegistered#15675)
- Start date
If there was a button for bad grammar, I would have rated your post as being, between poor and semi-literate.
A shame then that essentially it's true!
And give your "grammar" my regards next time you see her.
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Careful you guys, the way the police are these days, next they'll be asking you how you knew they were dead and where you were when it happened.
.
I'm going do a Boris and blame TillsonCareful you guys, the way the police are these days, next they'll be asking you how you knew they were dead and where you were when it happened.
.
And revert to the old Navaho Indian Trick of screaming and begging if that doesn't work.
Unlike the Government you see I have made a cunning plan for every eventuality.
If you recall I forecast this result and the problem people have in accepting the result is that those in the remain camp know very well that the voters have been indoctrinated against the EU by a thirty year campaign of lies by Government and Press to cover up Government incompetence.
The result is not democracy, it's more in the nature of an outbreak of misplaced rage directed at the wrong villain of the piece.
Why did I forecast a win for Brexit?
Because when people have been presented lies as truth all theirs lives they are going to react in a predicable fashion, against the perceived cause of their woes and the Government and RentaFreepress had made damn sure that was the EU, which is why when Cameron for the first time in his life tried to defend the EU it fell on deaf ears.
And for what it's worth, if the promises made by the leave politicians aren't kept they are in a very sticky position, with regard to the public, which is why they are disappearing from the scene like rats from a sinking ship.
Even if the Stock Market goes into an orgasm of boom.
I wouldn't overturn this decision even if I could
You need to find that if a thing looks too good to be true, it generally is.
By the way even after the Referendum the press is still spewing it's lies, either because it suffers from mental diarrhoea, or it realises the support for Brexit needs to be carefully nurtured or it will disappear like a Tory or UKIP politician.
Last edited:
And as a beneficial side effect the enormous thermal generated by all this hot air has finally closed the hole in the Ozone layer.
Can I have a biscuit too?
OG
There's been a revision on that which you may not have seen
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/eu-referendum-brexit-turnout-young-voters-youth-vote-double-a7129181.html
House prices could fall,but personally I doubt it. My daughter has just sold her house in the Midlands,the first day she had 9 viewings,it went to the asking price and sold immediately,the laws of supply and demand-there are just not enough houses for us all.
40 % of food is imported from dollar currency linked countries,if the pound v dollar falls ,food prices rise,fortunately the dollar seems to be rising again.
KudosDave
Just a couple of points
Flud stated that the EU is Bankrupt
Here is the 2016 Budget
http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-annual-budget/2016/
Strange kind of Bankruptcy
Theresa May’s husband is a senior executive at a $1.4tn investment fund that profits from tax avoiding companies
So we can assume no conflict of interest there, can't we?
Flud stated that the EU is Bankrupt
Here is the 2016 Budget
http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-annual-budget/2016/
Strange kind of Bankruptcy
Theresa May’s husband is a senior executive at a $1.4tn investment fund that profits from tax avoiding companies
So we can assume no conflict of interest there, can't we?
he is also a major shareholder in g4s
https://www.change.org/p/david-cameron-theresa-may-should-be-removed-as-home-secretary-due-to-a-conflict-of-interests
the british establishment is such a lovely ethical thing. on the other (nervously shaking) hand it still beats the hell out of leadsom and a pound struggling for parity with the yen
So May's husband is a successful businessman.
He should be locked up for that, I say.
Anyway, I thought you remain deniers wanted what's good for business.
But look on the bright side, leaving will lead to the collapse of business which will mean May's husband will go skint.
He should be locked up for that, I say.
Anyway, I thought you remain deniers wanted what's good for business.
But look on the bright side, leaving will lead to the collapse of business which will mean May's husband will go skint.
Look up the words "Conflict of interest" and try to understand them.
I rather like you new catch phrase "remain deniers" do explain what it means.
Do we deny we will remain?
You need a better line than that.
Try leave deniers, but then is that really what you mean? do you know yourself by now?
And I was rather looking forward to Brexit happening to see what your version of "ethnic cleansing" of politics has actually accomplished, but now it appears the whole process will likely take 7 years, I don't really rate the chances of it being anything it's own Mother would recognise, if it ever happens, do you?
Last edited:
That's already been done by those who matter and a decision taken.
There is no conflict of interest, so all that's left for the likes of you is to squeal about it and start stupid petitions on the internet.
Happily, no one with half a brain, let alone a full one, takes any notice.
Remove a serving Prime Minister because her husband makes a few quid?
Utter (green-eyed) nonsense.
No wonder you can't see a problem there, as you work on the principle that if I want it to be right it will be.
And once again I refer you to my post #1305 where I confirm a second petition is pointless.
"and start stupid petitions on the internet."
It was only a couple of days ago I referred to it.
"Remove a serving Prime Minister because her husband makes a few quid?"
She isn't yet is she?
Have you an attention span problem?
Do pay attention, and a few less silly aggressive attacks would be welcome, they damage what little credibility you have.
If you think you've been aggressively attacked, you need to go out more.
Probably a good idea anyway, your dozens if not hundreds of posts in these EU threads suggest someone who has become obsessed and is losing touch with reality.
That reality could be found outside your front door.