I don't know why you are being so mean-minded Garry, the Londoners are very much real Londoners compared with some other regions. For example, the four persons of the two boat crews who won sailing medals today all live at Portland in Dorset because of their sailing interests. But one was born in Aberdeen, one in Manchester, one in Cardiff and the remaining one actually at Weymouth where the sailing is being held. So if you are going to pick at the London competitors to try to show they aren't real Londoners, you'll find that the other regions athletes are often even less of their declared areas. People do move during their life, but as a Londoner myself I only have to listen to London's successful athletes to know if they are Londoners as reported.
As I posted in reply to you elsewhere, London has seriously lacked training facilities so why on earth would athletes from elsewhere move here, only to have to travel long distances away for training? It defies logic.
The figures don't mean the rest of the UK won nothing, but they do mean that London, Yorkshire and Scotland with 31% of the UK population did exceptionally well. At the point of the figures above, between those two counties and one country they had won 42 of the 52 medals won by Team GB and 20 of the 25 golds. Since then the medal tally has increased by 4 further medals, none of them London or Yorkshire wins, one a Scottish win, so the rest of the country is redressing the balance slightly now.
Overall it looks unbalanced, but those areas are or contain big cities or conurbations and sport enthusiasms tend to develop by area. For example, with the Thames handy and it's Henley Regatta associations, it's not surprising that London turns out top rowers. With the Cowes Week associations, it's not surprising that the South Coast produces top sailors. Big zones or favourable circumstances can produce big activity movements in the way smaller provincial towns and villages in much of the country are unlikely to.
The simple fact is Garry that London is good at almost everything, much as that might upset you. In my part, a number of the American executives live here for their tours of duty and they have a saying, "London's where it buzzes". This ain't sleepy valley like so many of the other parts of the UK, the pace of life is much faster and the work rates high. London's exports including financial services dwarf the exports of the whole of the rest of the UK, and without London the UK would be instantly bankrupt. In another way of showing how good we are, the National Association of Chief Police Officers voted London's drivers the best in the country, and London isn't even represented in that body since we don't have a Chief Police Officer. And just look at the good job we've done of the Olympics, universally praised at all levels. Even the World Wide Web that we are communicating on was invented by Londoner Tim Berners-Lee, now Sir Tim.
We're good Garry, and so are those other two very proud regions, Yorkshire and Scotland. The pride of these regions surpasses that of most areas of the UK and the outcome is inevitably the success that comes of punching well above their weight. As proof, just look at this thread. I proclaimed London's success, Hech raised the success of his native Scotland's star and Dianefairhall posted Yorkshire's claims to fame. No-one from elsewhere was proud enough to point to any of the winners they've had. Says it all, doesn't it?
.