Contrary to the implication of your post flecc, I imagine that there are many posties who would favour a degree of change - but there may be disagreement about its nature. For example, many might favour changing the injustice in the circumstances that saw fat cat 'high up' Adam Crozier walk away from the Post with a £2 million bonus (paid by the public purse) for axing 60,000 jobs in his period as boss..Sorry Cogs, but avoiding change is a pipe dream, things just cannot carry on as they were in the past. The whole nature of the business that the Royal Mail postal service does has fundamentally changed and the way in which they handle that different business imposed on them by progress has to change as well if they are to compete with the private sector.
There was a time when a postie carried very large numbers of light and lucrative envelopes, now much of what they carry is often quite large packages, bulked out by low income junk mail. They have to have new ways of transporting enough daily to get the income the organisation needs to maintain a universal national service.
.
Many might also have concerns about, and would like to see some sort of change that would prevent 'elite' cash guzzlers like Crozier picking up at least £14 million for his new job at ITV?
It seems to me that there are always those around (like Crozier and his supporters) who call for belt tightening and change amongst those who do the work, but are then quick to decry any call for change if it remotely affects their own greed induced circumstances..