Flecc REALLY doesn't like the law as it stands on ownership of property and probably, truth be told, about ownership of anything at all. What he likes, is government that tells people what to do and what they can own and how they must travel. Right to private property is against his principles. Maybe he should come clean and call himself Mau tse flecc...
Once again, the grossest of exaggeration, so once again from me, please take some urgently needed reading lessons. I've made no mention of ownership of property, whether residential or any other sort.
I posted about ownership of LAND, the lack of which does not prevent ownership of property. Mine for example enjoys a 999 year lease, a huge multiple of my lifespan. I don't even own it any longer having cashed it in, but have the legal right to live in it until 2060 when I'll be 130 years old if still alive.
The truth is that I am all for the maximum private ownership of all forms of property that doesn't deprive others, since that implies investment over saving which stimulates the economy and can add to national wealth and individual well being. That's the conservative in me that seems to puzzle you so much.
So not in any way as extreme as you are, but someone who believes in the best of all compatible elements of policy for the benefit of all. I am in short a true centrist, politically the nearest being moderate socialism in the Scandinavian model.
.