Perhap if they stopped making road bumps they could use the material to fill the pot holes? Win WinI don't mind 20mph zones at all but I hate road bumps. Useless things.
TTFN
John.
Perhap if they stopped making road bumps they could use the material to fill the pot holes? Win WinI don't mind 20mph zones at all but I hate road bumps. Useless things.
Or cut out the middleman and describe the potholes as a traffic calming measure - concave speed humps anyone?Perhap if they stopped making road bumps they could use the material to fill the pot holes? Win Win
TTFN
John.
I hate to say it, but you are becoming more English each year.20mph certainly has it's place, but the blanket application we have here in Wales is a totally confusing mess. We have been told that if you see street lights assume 20mph unless there are signs to the contrary. Fair enough in the city.
Here, in rural village land, we have the spectacle of 30 signs followed by newly installed 20 signs followed by prexisting 30 repeater signs. All in areas where street lamps are, at best, intermittant and in no way regular. There are also areas where the 30 signs are all fully in place (inc repeaters) yet the led flashing signs are indicating 20. There are areas with regular street lamps still fully signed as 30.
Many 20 signs have either been painted over or even cut down altogether.
Of course it's there to save life and reduce injury despite this being in areas where you could wait all day and not see a pedestrian.
Confusion reigns supreme and all utterances from the senedd only serve to make it worse. Ridicule is rife.
Since we all use electricity to charge our e-bikes, I thought I'd post this here as well:
Something very close to home, FUEL PRICES.
For those of you what dont yet know the new prices from April 1st, I've received mine:
I'm electricity only and my current month bill for this 20th January to 20th February is £196.19 including VAT.
Exactly the same bill after the 1st April increase will be £306.87 including VAT.
That's up 56.41%.
I'm one of the fortunate few who won't be bothered in any way by this, but I'm well aware that these sort of costs will be disastrous for many. I can foresee many elderly and vulnerable people dying of hypothermia next winter if the government doesn't do something far more drastic than their present inadequate relief plans.
.
I am sure if we all go we might just get a half price cup of Uranium from Mr Putin with collective bargaining. or we could arrange a bus trip and head cross West African Plains to dig some up in Niger, we might see some French picking scraps up form the desert floorUranium Demand
Even with aggressive leverage exerted on Putin's dream of becoming Tsar of the world, I fear Uranium will be too rich for my blood. I might afford solar?I am sure if we all go we might just get a half price cup of Uranium from Mr Putin with collective bargaining
Oh I assumed, by now you would of extracted several grams of americium-241 from 1970's smoke detectors and aliexpress-ed a self build DIY reactor by now.Uranium will be too rich for my blood. I might afford solar?
Interesting economic analysis of renewables vs traditional re electricity prices from a PhD economist, from 10:00 at Myth no.3.
Does US really have 7, 8, 9c/kwh juice, or is that wholesale? Eh, if only!
You have to understand that there's virtually no money to be made by going against the climate change narrative. It's often career suicide. On the other hand, if you promote the agenda, your work gets promoted. It's the same with the doctors, who speak against the vaccine. Some of them even had their licences revoked for it. You have to ask yourself why these guys would want to commit career suicide? What are they going to achieve from it?Bruce Everett
Bruce Everett Credentials Background Bruce McKenzie Everett is an energy analyst, adjunct professor at the Georgetown School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, and Adjunct Associate Professor of International Business at Tufts University. He has over three decades of experience in the...www.desmog.com
He just seems to parrot contrarian talking points that have been answered a million times
- “Climate activists, including President Obama, now erroneously call carbon dioxide (CO2) a “pollutant,” akin to poisons like lead and mercury. […] Greenhouses routinely set carbon dioxide levels at 1,000-1,500 ppm to boost photosynthesis and grow crops faster. A better term for carbon dioxide is ‘plant food.’ ” (See SkepticalScience here and here)
- “Recent changes in temperature, CO2 concentration and sea level are very small on a geological time scale.” (See SkepticalScience)
- “Computer models that generate apocalyptic warming scenarios still can’t make any correct predictions.” (See SkepticalScience)
- “90 percent of the greenhouse effect that keeps the Earth livable comes from water vapor, mainly in the form of clouds. Although carbon dioxide does have a warming impact, observations suggest that doubling CO2 concentrations would raise temperatures only 1-2 degrees Fahrenheit.” (See SkepticalScience)
- “The U.S. Energy Information Administration projects global carbon dioxide emissions of about 370 billion metric tons between now and 2025. President Obama’s climate program (characterized as “bold” and “ambitious” by some media outlets) would reduce those emissions by less than 2 percent. […] our politicians try to placate climate activists with expensive subsidies, burdensome regulations and vague promises — an “all pain, no gain” policy.” (See SkepticalScience here and here)